You are in: General Assembly > General Assembly Report 2003 > Ecumenical

 

Ecumenical

 

 

The role of the Ecumenical Committee is to foster ecumenical development in the life of the United Reformed Church:

 

a) in response to the Basis of Union (para.8)

 

‘The United Reformed Church has been formed in obedience to the call to repent of what has been amiss in the past and to be reconciled.  It sees its formation and growth as a part of what God is doing to make his people one, and as a united church will take, wherever possible and with all speed, further steps towards the unity of all God’s people.’

 

b) in relation to other churches and the wider community ‑ in these islands, across Europe, and throughout the world.

 

The committee will seek to ensure that wherever the United Reformed Church meets in worship, council or committee, it is working in partnership with Christians in the locality, the World Church and the whole human family.

 

 

TASKS

 

Among the tasks of this committee is listening to those with experience of the World Church, including other Christian traditions in Britain and Ireland, and to those with experience of current affairs and of other faiths.

 

The Committee maintains official United Reformed Church links with overseas churches and world and regional ecumenical organisations. It guides the United Reformed Church’s participation in the Council for World Mission.

 

Through it official contact is made with British and Irish ecumenical bodies.

 

The work of selecting, training and caring for missionaries and overseeing exchange of personnel is undertaken by the International Exchange Sub‑Committee.

 

Committee Members

 

Convener: Revd John Rees

 

Secretaries: Revd Sheila Maxey, Secretary for Ecumenical Relations

Revd Philip Woods, Secretary for International Relations Revd Dale Rominger, International Relations Programme Officer

 

Members:  Revd Mary Buchanan (‑ 2002), Revd Phillip Jones (‑ 2002), Revd Elizabeth Nash (‑ 2002), Revd Bryan Shirley, Mrs Darnette Whitby‑Reid, Revd Cecil White, Revd Rowena Francis (2002 ‑), Mr Malcolm Porter (2002 ‑) Revd Lindsay Sanderson (2002 ‑)

 

The National Synod of Scotland: Revd John Smith (‑2002), Revd Mary Buchanan (2002 ‑)

 

The National Synod of Wales: Revd Stuart Jackson.

 

Convener of the International Exchange Sub‑Committee: Revd John Crocker (‑ 2002), Revd Chris Baillie (2002 ‑)

 

Representatives of other committees: Dr Andrew Bradstock (Church and Society), Revd Alistair Ellefsen‑Jones (Inter‑Faith Relations), Revd Carole Ellefsen‑Jones (Training), Revd Hugh Graham (Doctrine, Prayer and Worship), Revd Suzanne Hamnett (Life and Witness), Mrs Rosemary Johnston (Youth and Children’s Work), Ms Avis Reaney (Finance), Mrs Katalina Tahaafe‑Williams (Racial Justice).

 

Representatives of other churches: Mrs Elizabeth Fisher (Church of England), Revd Peter Sulston (Methodist Church), Revd Colin McClure (Presbyterian Church in Ireland)

 

 

1. Introduction

 

1.1 The Three Ecumenical Principles for a Missionary Church in Today’s World were brought to the 2001 General Assembly by the Ecumenical Committee and, with one amendment, adopted and commissioned to be produced in the form of an attractive leaflet.  Those leaflets were available by the 2002 General Assembly and have been widely distributed, not only to every local United Reformed Church, but also to colleagues and visitors from other churches at home and abroad. 

 

1.2 The Ecumenical Committee has continued to use them as a yardstick for its work and so this report will group a selection from the wide range of the committee’s activities over the past two years under the three headings of the ecumenical principles.

 

1.3 In addition, a theme runs like a golden thread through this report, as it does through all the work of the committee: we are about relationships before we are about structures.  Ecumenical relationships without structures are very vulnerable and so the committee must also be concerned with the structures of partnership at home and abroad, but structures without relationships are lifeless. 

 

2 . ¼ to expand the range and deepen the nature of the Christian common life and witness in each local community.

 

2.1 In April 2002, the Methodist/United Reformed Church Liaison Committee sponsored a consultation, hosted by the Mid and West Wiltshire United Areas, on the possible use of that ecumenical model elsewhere.  Participants came from all over England and Wales, with more from the United Reformed Church than the Methodist Church.  This reflected the relevance of the model of a united area for our church at this time of clustering and grouping and radical re‑thinking.

 

2.2.1 The two main conclusions were, firstly, that there must already be good relationships on the ground, and they must go beyond one or two individuals, if the structure of a united area (serving as both district council and circuit) is to be effective: and, secondly, that the life and witness of the shared local church life of these two churches would benefit from serious doctrinal conversations on our understandings of ministry and of authority.  A brief report of the consultation can be found on the ecumenical page of the United Reformed Church web site.

 

2.2 In November 2002, the Group for Local Unity of Churches Together in England hosted a consultation entitled ‘Local Ecumenical Partnerships in changing times.’  It was an open‑ended, some would say incoherent, consultation.  No one doubted that single congregation LEPs were here to stay.  Like any other local church, they needed to be enabled and challenged by the parent churches.  However, the emphasis of the consultation was on taking local covenants to a deeper level of commitment ‑ an example of relationships before structures.  That emphasis was not unconnected to the ecumenical enthusiasm of the Roman Catholic and Baptist representatives.  The former cannot enter into single congregation LEPs and the latter were more concerned with shared mission and service.  The Salvation Army’s growing ecumenical commitment is also a new factor in the changing ecumenical landscape.

 

2.3 The Secretary for Racial Justice has twice given presentations to the committee on various ways in which the United Reformed Church might develop closer relations with congregations from the Reformed family, who do not (mainly) worship in English and who often share our buildings.  The quality of the local relationships, with a few exceptions, does not yet seem ready for more formal recognition that we and they are part of the same part of the body of Christ.  In this we lag behind some of our UK partner churches and are failing to respond to our changing society. 

 

2.4 In April 2002 the committee hosted a consultation of younger ecumenists (i.e. under 40) from within the United Reformed Church and asked them about their vision for the future of the Church.  They saw one church in terms of organisation and interchangeability of leadership in each local community ‑ but worshipping in several places and in different styles.  Although impatient of present denominational divisions, they were concerned about where authority lay and anxious about abuse of power, whether by councils or by individual leaders.

 

to proclaim more clearly, in word and deed, that in Christ we are one World Church family living in a world which God loves

 

3.1 Developing relationships with particular partner churches around the world through the personal experience of as many people as possible has been at the heart of the Belonging to the World Church programme. (see resolution 19)  But the committee is also responsible for church‑to‑church relationships, expressed through and beyond the Council for World Mission.

 

3.2 The committee has given priority to partnerships with churches in particular need. 

 

The Churches of Christ in Malawi is a CWM member church of 50,000 members, with only 20 ministers and 6 evangelists ‑ and yet is thriving on local lay leadership.  Malawi, including the Churches of Christ schools, needs teachers because one‑third have died of HIV/AIDS.  Through the pages of Reform this need has been promoted, but when one considers what they are achieving with a model of ministry inherited from the British Churches of Christ we have as much to receive from them as to give.

 

The United Reformed Church has developed relations with two Presbyterian churches in Angola over the years, offering occasional scholarships in Britain.  Today, having listened to them about what can be achieved in Angola, we are funding English teaching and other training programmes there at a fraction of the cost of bringing Angolans over here to train and so offering new opportunities to many more people than had previously been the case. 

 

In response to the desperate situation in the Middle East, and at the request of the 2001 General Assembly, the United Reformed Church is developing relations with the National Evangelical Synod of Syria and Lebanon.  A consultation, with the theme ‘Identity’, was held in February 2003 at a time when all eyes were on Iraq and what would unfold there.

 

3.3  Some partnerships are more explicitly reciprocal.

 

Our two Korean partner churches, the Presbyterian Church of Korea and the Presbyterian Church in the Republic of Korea, are considering the possibility of uniting and asked to come and learn about our history and current life as a united church.  We and they were challenged by the visit which took place in October 2002.  They spent time in London and in the South Western Synod and, whilst impressed with our union and our commitment to ecumenism and to working ecumenically, they wondered what we understood by mission and indeed whether mission in the UK was suffering because of a lack of competitive spirit between the churches!  This dialogue will continue in October in Korea.

 

Our two Ghanaian partner churches, the Presbyterian Church of Ghana and the Evangelical Presbyterian Church, Ghana, after decades of sending a Ghanaian minister to serve us and the Ghanaian community in the London area, have, in 2001 and 2002, also hosted parties of United Reformed Church ministers who have Ghanaians in their congregations.  Over a period of ten days they were introduced into the culture, rites of passage and spirituality of Ghanaian Presbyterians.  Thanks are due to Revd John Danso who had the original idea for this most useful in‑service training event, which has been picked up in the Belonging to the World Church programme.  In 2004 this will move to the Caribbean with an event aimed primarily at those with Jamaicans in their congregation.

 

In June 2002 the Evangelische Kirche der Pfalz and the United Reformed Church signed a new partnership agreement at their bi‑annual theological consultation in Landau, Germany, as they look to the 50th anniversary of this partnership in 2007.  This is one of our longest‑standing partnerships and involves congregational twinnings, exchange of ministers, and a particular link with the Yorkshire synod.

 

3.4 The World Church family gathers in larger groupings, sometimes according to geography, sometimes according to church tradition, in order to identify and carry out their particular common calling.  Although these gatherings ‑ for example, Churches Together in Britain and Ireland, the Conference of European Churches, the World Alliance of Reformed Churches, the Disciples Ecumenical Consultative Council, the World Council of Churches ‑ may seem faceless structures to those who never experience them, they consist of people on whose commitment and enthusiasm and openness to other perspectives much depends.  If the World Church family is to witness to the reconciling power of the Gospel in a broken and warring world then people must meet and listen to one another, however difficult that might be – and then share those insights back home. 

 

3.4.1 For example, six United Reformed Church people attended the Seventh International Consultation of United and Uniting Churches in September 2002 in the Netherlands ‑ all in different capacities.  One was the official representative of the United Reformed Church, one a member of the planning group, one a keynote speaker, one presenting a case study, one leading a Bible study and one representing the Welsh Commission of Covenanting Churches.  Out of that face to face meeting with people from churches in every continent which had united or were trying to unite for a variety of reasons, came important questions (based on some challenging encounters!) which touch our life as the United Reformed Church: Are we better able, as a united church, to address the issues which divide the human family?  While pursuing unity at home, do we perpetuate or even encourage disunity abroad by the way we practise partnership in mission?  Do we cherish the streams of tradition which formed us, so that we do not just become another denomination but a church on the way to a greater unity we cannot yet see?

 

3.5 Relationships, especially beyond the local, are particularly vulnerable in times of financial pressure.  The United Reformed Church has, in the past, contributed to the UK ecumenical bodies out of proportion to its size.  The committee, with much regret, took the opportunity of a revised formula for the member churches’ contributions and decided to offer only the required minimum.  At its January 2003 meeting, it agreed to make further cuts in the 2004 budget by freezing, for a year, grants to various other ecumenical pieces of work and bodies.

 

3.6 The Council for World Mission is our closest World Church family and the richest.  It has been using its new money creatively and generously, with an emphasis on mission, on ecumenical working, and on devolving initiative to its regions.  It is through CWM money that the United Reformed Church has been able to develop its multi‑cultural, multi‑racial ministry and to support some exciting local mission projects identified by Mission Council’s Advisory Group on Grants and Loans.  CWM money has made it possible to appoint a full‑time European Region Mission Enabler, Ms Francis Brienen.  But CWM is about much more than money.  Our relationships within that family are being continually strengthened by the sending and receiving of mission partners, by the Assembly Moderators’ visits, by synod exchanges and partnerships with particular churches, by the sharing of news through Inside Out and the CWM videos, and by regular praying for one another with the help of the Prayer Handbook.

 

3.7 The World Church family lives, as our ecumenical principle states, ‘in a world which God loves’ and so the political and economic context in which our partners live is of concern to us.  Since September 11 2001 (a day on which the committee was meeting) the committee has had the international situation on its agenda as never before, with our understanding of global events being informed by the perspectives of partners around the world.  In this, our relationships give us an intimacy with events that might otherwise seem distant and remote.  Through Mission Council and General Assembly it has voiced the concern of the United Reformed Church about the Middle East and the prospect of war in Iraq.  Letters of sympathy and solidarity have been sent to partner churches in the United States, Pakistan, India and the Middle East.

 

4  to persevere in the search for the visible and organic unity of the Church.

 

4.1 This principle has been tested and challenged in various ways in all three nations over the past two years.  What has become clear is that there are different ways to unity, different understandings of the nature of unity, different understandings of the nature of the Church, and we, as a united church committed to the unity of all God’s people, need to be prepared, with integrity and consistency, to explore different paths with different partners.  That requires us to be rigorous in our theological work and honest about the theological breadth of our church.  As we develop creative relationships with a variety of partner churches within the body of Christ, so we strengthen our capacity to develop more creative relationships between those of a different theological standpoint within our own church.

 

4.2  The proposed covenant between the Church of England and the Methodist Church, and the report of the trilateral informal conversations involving the United Reformed Church have had a prominent place on all the agendas of the committee over the past two years.  The fruit of that work is to be found in the supporting statement to the committee’s resolution on this matter (see page 64).

 

4.3 The committee shared the National Synod of Wales’ deep disappointment at the failure, through lack of a sufficient majority in the Church in Wales’ vote, of the proposal for an Ecumenical Bishop in Wales.  It could perhaps be seen as a structural proposal which did not have enough of a relational basis.  However, as with the proposed English covenant, the process has shaken up the ecumenical movement and is now challenging the Welsh churches to consider how real is their ecumenical commitment and with which partners it might be possible, at present, to move on.

 

4.4 The committee has also followed closely the Scottish Church Initiative for Union (SCIFU).  (see resolution 2 page 14 from the National Synod of Scotland.)  It ambitiously offers a Basis and Plan for Union at a time when covenants seem to be in and structural unions are not.  However, it is an imaginative proposal, rooted in a concern for shared mission in the community, and it allows for considerable diversity in local church life. 

 

4.5 The search for the full unity of the Church requires us not only to develop ecumenical relationships, but also together as churches to dig ever deeper into the meaning of the Gospel and the nature of God and therefore the nature of the Church.  This is slow, painstaking work which may, in time, call us to radical change.

 

4.6 In November 2001 Churches Together in Britain and Ireland held a thought‑provoking consultation on ‘Ways to Unity’ at which the United Reformed Church was well represented.  The traditional starting point of ‘our common baptism’ was strongly challenged.  Member churches are now being asked to reflect on how they ‘incorporate’ people into the Church and what they believe is the role of the Holy Spirit in the process.

 

4.7 What does being Reformed mean today?  That was a question addressed at a consultation at the Windermere Centre in December 2001 of representatives from the Church of Scotland, the Presbyterian Church in Ireland, the Presbyterian Church of Wales and the United Reformed Church.  Do the ‘free churches’ in England have a future as an ecumenical grouping distinct from Churches Together in England?  That is the question being addressed at present by the churches of the Free Churches Group within Churches Together in England.

 

4.8 Addressing these questions at some depth is part of the search for the full unity of the Church.  Discussing at some depth the answers to Jesus’ question ‘Who do you say that I am?’ given on the CWM video of that name, is also part of that search. 

 

 

5 Thanks, farewell and welcome

 

5.1 One of the stated tasks of this committee is ‘listening to those with experience of the World Church, including other Christian traditions in Britain and Ireland.’  The committee has benefited from the presence, annually, of Revd Elizabeth Nash, the present Moderator of the Department for Cooperation and Witness of the World Alliance of Reformed Churches and Revd Jill Thornton, a new ‘younger member’ of the Central Committee of the World Council of Churches.  It has also greatly valued the insights and contributions to discussion of Revd Colin McClure from the Presbyterian Church in Ireland, Revd Peter Sulston from the Methodist Church and Mrs Elizabeth Fisher from the Church of England.

 

5.2 After ten years as Secretary for Ecumenical Relations, we say farewell to Revd Sheila Maxey, who is retiring at the end of July.  Not only has Sheila’s contribution to the development of the ecumenical life of the United Reformed Church been enormous, but she has become a highly regarded figure in the ecumenical scene across the nations; for example, through her work as Moderator of the Church Life Liaison Group of Churches Together in Britain and Ireland (CTBI) and as a member of the Scottish Church Initiative For Union (SCIFU).  Sheila’s constant commitment to the highest standards of good practice and her fundamental belief in the importance of relationships, ensure that the work she been doing (for example, in building up the Ecumenical Officers’ network, fostering the development of single ethnic congregations, facilitating collaboration with Doctrine, Prayer & Worship on issues of faith and order and many other things) will endure. We wish her a long, happy, healthy (and busy‑doing‑ecumenical‑things) retirement.

 

5.3 We welcome Revd Richard Mortimer, as the newly appointed Secretary for Ecumenical Relations and Faith & Order.  (The addition of ‘Faith & Order’ to the job title indicates that the post, building on the work of the previous Secretary, now includes a particular emphasis on this area).  Richard is admirably qualified for the work, having had a wide range of ecumenical experience at both local and wider levels, and having formerly served as a member of the Ecumenical Committee.  His theological knowledge, insightful mind, personable character, thorough working methods and passionate commitment to the ecumenical journey are recognised by our ecumenical partners as well as ourselves, and they join us in looking forward eagerly to working with Richard in the years ahead.

 

 

Resolution 18  Anglican Methodist Covenant

 

General Assembly

 

a). gives thanks to God for the proposal of an Anglican Methodist Covenant as a significant move towards the Christian unity for which we pray – and to which we, as a united and uniting church are committed in our Basis of Union ‑ and as a strengthening of God’s mission to the world through the co‑operation it encourages.

 

b). rejoicing in the stated commitment of the Church of England, the Methodist Church and the United Reformed Church to the unity of the Church of Christ, instructs the Ecumenical Committee to explore with these two churches (but with an openness to other partners) what further steps would be necessary to form a covenantal relationship or relationships between or among these churches.

 

c). gives thanks to God for Conversations on the Way to Unity, the report of the tri‑lateral informal conversations between the three churches – for the common ground it uncovers, for its honest exploration of difference within the one body of Christ and for the dedicated service of those who represented the Unit

ed Reformed Church – Revd Robert Andrews, Revd John Waller, Revd Elizabeth Welch and Revd Sheila Maxey.

 

d). affirms the agenda for further work on this ecumenical journey with these partners as set out in paragraph 73 of Conversations on the Way to Unity:

 

the relationship between how we understand the nature of the Church and our understanding of the nature of and path to Christian unity

 

the relationship between personal and conciliar oversight and authority in the life of the church, locally and more widely

 

our understandings of ordination and authorisation of the whole range of ministries

 

the relationship between and understanding of baptism and membership

 

and adds, as a matter of priority, from the riches of our traditions and for the sake of the mission of the Church, the question of how ministry is (and may be) exercised through persons and councils, locally and more widely, by the whole people of God; and how such ministry is to be recognised within a covenantal relationship. 

 

e). mindful that all ministries in the United Reformed Church are open to both men and women (Basis of Union para 25) and that “the United Reformed Church declares that the Lord Jesus Christ, the only ruler and head of the Church, has therein appointed a government distinct from civil government and in things spiritual not subordinate thereto” (Basis of Union Schedule D.8), requires the Ecumenical Committee in any future conversations to keep before the Church of England our concerns about its present limits to women’s ministry and our difficulties with its present established position.

 

 

1.1The Basis of Union of the United Reformed Church (1972, 1981 and 2000) states that  “as a united church (we) will take, wherever possible and with all speed, further steps towards the unity of all God’s people.”  The 2001 General Assembly re‑stated that commitment in 21st century terms by adopting Three Ecumenical Principles for a Missionary Church in Today’s World.   In those principles the breadth of our commitment to “the unity of all God’s people” was set out – ranging from a continuing commitment to work towards the visible and organic unity of the Church to expanding the range of our local Christian partnerships in mission and service; from welcoming Christians from many cultures into our local churches and being changed by them to developing our world church partnerships in mission.  It is in the context of this broad commitment to unity in mission that we are called to explore each new challenge to be faithful to our calling to seek  “the unity of all God’s people.”

 

1.2 From our experience of uniting we have two main insights to share, which we believe to be a matter of ‘gospel’ and not just ‘good practice’.  Firstly, one test of the faithfulness of a unity proposal to God’s purposes lies in the way the smaller partner is listened to and considered. Secondly, there is a fruitful tension between unity and diversity in all such proposals which must be held and not resolved – unity not uniformity is the goal.

 

1.3 We are a church in three nations and in each the ecumenical opportunities and challenges are different.  However, just as the whole United Reformed Church has been concerned with the proposals for an Ecumenical Bishop in Wales and with the Scottish Church Initiative for Union, while allowing the views of the two national synods to carry great weight, so this resolution, although applying to England, is of concern to the whole Church.

 

1.4...... The English church scene is noted internationally for its many Local Ecumenical Partnerships and the United Reformed Church, the Methodist Church and the Church of England are the major players in them.  In 1995 the Church of England and the Methodist Church began, informally at first and then formally from 1998, to seek a more formal relationship which would facilitate their shared mission locally and at diocesan and national levels.  We were invited, along with other partners, to appoint ecumenical participants to those talks and Revd Dr David Thompson and Revd Sheila Maxey served in that capacity. Because of the United Reformed Church’s close involvement with both churches in Local Ecumenical Partnerships of all kinds, trilateral informal conversations were also set up to run alongside the formal conversations.  The reports of both sets of conversations were received at General Assembly 2002 and Assembly commended both for study and response throughout the church.  

 

1.5 The Ecumenical Committee and the Doctrine, Prayer and Worship Committee, advised by the Advisory Group on Faith and Order, considered the two reports.  They came to the conclusion that this was not the time for a detailed critique of either the covenant proposal or the trilateral report.  Rather it was the time to consider them as a whole in the light of our broad‑based ecumenical commitment, the urgent missionary task and the reality of local ecumenical life.  This meant listening to the whole United Reformed Church.

 

1.6 The Ecumenical Committee arranged for every local church, district council and synod to receive material to enable it to express a view on whether the United Reformed Church should, if invited, be party to this or a similar covenant and whether, if so, there were treasured aspects of our tradition or perhaps problematic aspects of our partners’ traditions which should form part of the exploratory process.  Over 100 local churches, 16 district councils and every synod responded.  The thoughtfulness and perceptiveness of the responses is a tribute to the life and health of our church meetings and elders’ meetings and other councils.  In some cases, especially in the synod meetings, ecumenical partners took part in or enabled the discussion.  The resolutions above reflect, in general and majority terms, the tenor of the responses.  It was reassuring to discover that most of the concerns raised fell within the list of ‘further work’ already to be found in the trilateral report, Conversations on the Way to Unity.

 

 

Resolution 19  Belonging to the World Church

 

The General Assembly receiving the report of the Ecumenical Committee on the Belonging to the World Church programme

 

a) welcomes what has been achieved and encourages the committee to continue to    develop the programme, and

 

b) encourages more people to make use of the opportunities it offers to experience and learn    from the world church and so enrich the life and witness of the United Reformed Church.

 

In 1998 the General Assembly adopted the Belonging to the World Church programme with the following resolution:

 

This Assembly receives the Belonging to the World Church programme proposals and encourages the Ecumenical Committee to implement them.

 

The report setting out the details of the Belonging to the World Church programme envisaged that the first pilot programmes would be up and running in 1999/2000. However, unforeseen difficulties in the early stages of implementation meant that no significant developments occurred until 2001, when Dale Rominger took up the post of International Relations Programme Officer. 

 

At a point now when most aspects of the programme, as modified by the Ecumenical Committee in its review in January 2001, are up and running (see below) the Ecumenical Committee felt it right to take stock of what the programme set out to do and what it is achieving and to provide a report to the General Assembly.

 

The central objective of the programme was:

 

To raise our awareness of the world church so that we might

 

Stretch the imagination and vision of people in the United Reformed Church by exposing them to churches whose life and circumstances whilst markedly different from ours, offer much to be learned about being the church engaged in God’s mission today

 

Take seriously the global challenges facing us and find ways of responding together as Christians called to care for God’s world.

 

To do this our international relations staff has developed opportunities and programmes on a mutual reciprocal basis with our partner churches around the world as follows (using the headings from the original report):

 

1 Initial ministerial training

 

Group Exchange Programme opportunities with the United Church in Jamaica and the Cayman Islands, the Presbyterian Reformed Church in Cuba, the Presbyterian Church of Ghana and the Evangelical Presbyterian Church, Ghana.

 

Grants of up to £1,500 per person for individual programmes that meet certain criteria and are arranged through consultation with the college/training course, and the International Relations Office.

 

2 Global Partners

 

Enabling synods to develop exchange programmes with partner churches outside of Europe.

 

With the Commitment for Life programme bringing Commitment for Life partners here to share their stories and experiences with United Reformed Church congregations and councils and assisting with United Reformed Church exposure visits to Commitment for Life partners.

 

3 Continuing Ministerial Education

 

Programme opportunities for new Assembly appointees (committee conveners and staff) with the Presbyterian Reformed Church in Cuba and the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan

 

Programme opportunities for ministers and lay people ministering in multi‑ethnic situations to learn about the cultures and traditions of particular ethnic groups with the Presbyterian Church of Ghana and the Evangelical Presbyterian Church, Ghana and the United Church in Jamaica and the Cayman Islands.

 

Grants of up to £1000 no more than once every five years for ministers and Church Related Community Workers over and above their usual CME grants for the international‑related costs (i.e. travel, etc.) of an overseas CME event/experience.

 

Development of the (ecumenical) International Ministry Exchanges programme to enhance the range of opportunities and the CME content of the programme.

 

4 Lay training Opportunities

 

Provision of funding, advice and assistance with travel arrangements for international lay training initiatives/opportunities.

 

Promotion, grant assistance and increased take‑up of opportunities through the World Exchange volunteer programme.

 

5 Opportunities for Young People and Children

 

Participation in the international Bridge Project.

 

Provision of international travel opportunity for the FURY Chairperson (akin to the opportunities offered to the Moderator of General Assembly).

 

Promotion of and funding assistance with international opportunities for young people.

 

6 Research Fellowships

 

Funding and support for the Woodlands Project in conjunction with Northern College and North Western Synod.

 

7 Scholarship Programme

 

Improved use of placements for scholarship holders with United Reformed Church congregations.

 

Refocusing of the programme to better meet the needs of our partner churches.

 

8 World Convention of the Churches of Christ

 

Promotion of this opportunity to share in a large (several thousand strong) gathering of Christians from around the world when it meets in Brighton, 28 July – 1 August 2004, co‑hosted by ourselves and the Fellowship of the Churches of Christ.

 

Over 100 people a year from the United Reformed Church are directly supported through the programme, giving them an experience of the life and witness of our overseas partner churches in their context.  Many hundreds more here in Great Britain have an opportunity to meet and share with our overseas partners who are visiting us to share their stories and experiences within the life of our congregations and councils.

 

Those who have experienced the programme are excited by its benefits as they find themselves envisioning how the church could find new ways of living out God’s mission in their context, or begin to make connections with people in another part of the world and through their eyes see the international issues and challenges facing us today in ways which make fresh sense, leading them to discover new responses.

 

Not surprisingly with a programme as ambitious and as complex as this there have been problems.  In particular we have discovered that patience is a virtue and a necessity when piecing together international programmes and exchanges, and that personal contact makes all the difference, building trust and confidence with churches who are not always used to being treated as equal partners.

 

At its meeting in January 2003 the Ecumenical Committee adopted a number of minor modifications to this programme and to a range of other international programmes, bringing these programmes into the framework of Belonging to the World Church, effecting some savings both of funds and staff time.  In particular it resolved to end the Research Fellowships programme, as it had not developed as expected (that is with a significant world church component).  However, the committee continues to work with colleges and synods attempting to secure funds for such initiatives from other sources.  It also resolved to integrate the (1996) European partnerships policy with the Global Partners programme to enable a better overview of all such activity and a streamlining of the funding sources.

 

The Belonging to the World Church programme (excluding the scholarship programme which already existed, but which has been incorporated into the Belonging to the World Church framework) costs around £170,000 a year (including staff costs).  This has been funded by drawing down on the World Church and Mission Unexpended Income Fund and so to date it has not been a charge on the Mission and Ministry fund.  A time will come, however, in the not too distant future, when a decision will need to be taken on whether this programme should be funded from the main budget of the church.  In the meantime the Ecumenical Committee proposes to continue the development of the programme, believing that it is enhancing the United Reformed Church’s life and witness both here in Great Britain and overseas and that it is meeting its central objective:

 

To raise our awareness of the world church so that we might

 

Stretch the imagination and vision of people in the United Reformed Church by exposing them to churches whose life and circumstances whilst markedly different from ours, offer much to be learned about being the church engaged in God’s mission today

 

Take seriously the global challenges facing us and find ways of responding together as Christians called to care for God’s world.

 

 

 

Resolution 20  International Situation

 

The Ecumenical Committee in consultation with the officers of the Church and Society Committee will bring a resolution on the international situation in the light of current events at the time of the Assembly.

 

1.1 In the past year Mission Council has responded to international events issuing statements on behalf of the church in the light of unfolding events, particularly in respect of the Middle East.  We have also worked collaboratively to bring our concerns to the attention of the government and others.  In particular the Moderator of the General Assembly, John Waller, participated in a joint United States and British church leaders delegation to meet with the Prime Minister in mid‑February.  Later in the same month, during a consultation with our partner the National Evangelical Synod of Syria and Lebanon, he was able to brief Christian and Muslim leaders in the Middle East on the actions of British and American churches to oppose the use of war as a mechanism to rid Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction.  In March, the Secretary for International Relations shared in a ‘webchat’ initiated by the Presbyterian Church (USA) on the threat of war with Iraq, enabling a number of churches around the world to share their concerns and answer viewers’ questions before an audience of Internet users.

 

1.2 Depending on events at the time Assembly may wish to make further comment or commend other actions.

 

 

International Exchange Sub‑Committee

 

The International Exchange Sub Committee is responsible for the selection, training and caring of mission partners for service here and overseas, and for overseeing the exchange of personnel, including the World Exchange volunteer programme.

 

 

Committee Members

 

Convener: Revd John Crocker (until December 2002)

Revd Chris Baillie (since January 2003)

Staff Secretaries: Revd Philip Woods – Secretary for International Relations

Revd Sheila Maxey – Secretary for Ecumenical Relations

Revd John Rees (Convener, Ecumenical Committee), Mr Peter Bryant*, Revd Keith Riglin*, Revd Gwen Collins, Revd Peter Brain*, Revd Birgit Ewald, and since Assembly 2002 Revd Nigel Uden and Mrs Heather Barnes.

 

* Members until Assembly 2002

 

1 Introduction

 

1.1 The major pre‑occupation of the International Exchange Sub‑Committee over the last two years has been the revising of the guidelines for the sending and receiving mission partner programmes.  Although our practice had been adapted in the light of experience, this was the first rewriting of the guidelines in ten years and now gives us, prospective mission partners and receiving situations a most comprehensive ‘handbook’ to aid us as we share people in mission with our partners both within the Council for World Mission (CWM) and beyond.  In undertaking this we involved the Personnel Resources staff of CWM and one month after we finalised our guidelines they too launched a revised edition of their ‘Sharing People in Mission’ handbook.

 

1.2 The new Guidelines have been produced in a format that enables easy updating, as our experience is that they are a work in progress, with regular changes called for as practice changes both within the United Reformed Church, our overseas partners and CWM.  Nonetheless to have rethought the whole package has been a valuable exercise and deepened our appreciation of all that is involved of so many people in so many places in these valuable exchanges of personnel between churches.

 

1.3 At the same time the committee has also codified its grants policies and incorporated them within the Belonging to the World Church programme to produce a more coherent system for supporting international exchange within the life of the United Reformed Church.

 

1.4 All of which makes us sound rather bureaucratic, which is far from the truth, as our meetings centre around the experiences of the people we are sending and receiving as mission partners, or who are otherwise engaged in international exchanges.

 

2 Sharing People in Mission Overseas

 

2.1 Since our last report Mary and Paul Thomas, along with their children, Peter and Helen, have taken up their appointments with the United Church in Jamaica and the Cayman Islands.  Mary is serving as a tutor with the ITLD programme and Paul as a Maths teacher in a church school. 

 

2.2 In the same period Elspeth and Ewan Harley completed their short‑term appointment with the Congregational Christian Church in Samoa and Jane Stranz moved from pastoral ministry with the Reformed Church of France to take up an appointment with the World Council of Church translation service.

 

2.3 Continuing in overseas service are Stephen and Hardy Wilkinson working with the Church of Jesus Christ in Madagascar (FJKM) and Alison Gibbs with the United Church of Zambia.  All three are our longest serving mission partners with the Wilkinsons having served thirty‑one years and Alison Gibbs nineteen.

 

2.4 What these barest of details fail to tell you is the stories our mission partners have to share about serving God in sickness and health, facing natural disasters, or virtual civil war, or economic crises, all the time working cross‑culturally and for most whilst thousands of miles away from home and the families and friends that are dear to them.  Neither do they tell of the rich blessings that they have received from sharing in the life of another country and all that they have gained from the new friendships that they have made in the settings they find themselves.  Of course its not all challenge or blessing, with the daily reality being much more mundane.  Nonetheless there is still something a little different about service overseas and with our partner churches we join in giving thanks for the service that these individuals offer in the service of God’s global mission today.

 

3 Sharing People in Mission from Overseas in Great Britain

 

3.1 Likewise for those mission partners we receive here.  The life of the United Reformed Church and, in many cases, its ecumenical partners continues to be enriched and challenged by mission partners from beyond Europe.  Their work takes many forms and we have much to thank them for.  At this Assembly, Mrs Jasmine Jebakani from the Church of South India finishes four years as a theological educator on the Southern Theological Education and Training Scheme, an ecumenical non‑residential training course based in Salisbury.  She is an Old Testament teacher, and has also brought Indian and feminist perspectives to her work.  She has been accompanied by her husband, Jacob and her sons, Jachin and Jonathan.

 

3.2 Also at this Assembly, Revd Francis Amenu from the Evangelical Presbyterian Church, Ghana will end his four years of service to the Ghanaian community in the London area both within and beyond the United Reformed Church.  He has worked to build bridges of understanding between different groups and cultures and denominations, not only within the Ghanaian community.  He has been accompanied by his wife, Gertrude, and their four teenage(and older) children – Christabel, Ethel, Mark and Lucille.   He will be succeeded by Revd Godwin Odonkor from the Presbyterian Church of Ghana, who will be accompanied by his wife, Paulina, and their little boy, Tsui.

 

3.3 Mr David Jonathan, from the Church of North India, is in his second year as an inter‑faith worker in Luton.  He works through an ecumenical organisation called Grassroots and is focusing on building bridges of trust and personal experience between church people (in particular from the United Reformed Church) and people from the other faith communities.  He is accompanied by his wife, Anjana and their little daughter, Muskaan.

 

3.4 Revd Chang, Jen‑Ho, from the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan, is completing his first year as a chaplain to Taiwanese students in Manchester.  His brief also includes a bridge‑building element – helping Taiwanese Christians to relate to British churches and British churches to learn how to welcome and learn from Christians from other cultures who are strangers in our midst.  He is accompanied by his wife, Hsui Wen, and their young son, Yueh Shuo.

 

3.5 Revd Henry Iputau, from the Congregational Christian Church in Samoa, arrived in January to assist Princes Street United Reformed Church, Norwich in its mission in the community.  He is accompanied by his wife, Maressa.

 

3.6 Two young  volunteers from CWM partner churches have joined the Yardley Hastings team:  Tedy Nkowane, from the United Church of Zambia and Nozipho Mpofu from the Zimbabwe Synod of the Uniting Presbyterian Church of Southern Africa.  Llanfair, the church in Penrhys in South Wales has continued its partnership with the Church of Jesus Christ in Madagascar through Tiana Raharisoa who has spent a year there.

 

3.7 Support, review and reflection.  The committee continues to ensure that the mission partners are well supported, that their position is reviewed after one year and that there is serious reflection on the experience towards the end of the four years.  The committee has also introduced a system of post‑service review two or three years after the mission partner has returned home.  The committee believes that reflection by United Reformed Church people on the experience adds considerably to its value. Following our now usual practice with the Ghanaian ministry, a major review (held once every four years), involving the leadership of the two partner churches in Ghana, took place in May 2002.

 

4 World Exchange

 

4.1 During the last two years more people have availed themselves of the opportunities offered by this ecumenical volunteer programme, with the following taking up placements:

Helene McLeod, Guatemala, 2001

Emma Dones, Malawi, 2001/2002

Nora Harbour, Malawi, 2002/2003

Ron Harbour, Malawi, 2002/2003

Sandra Fox, Malawi, 2003

Nicolas Morrice, India, 2003

 

4.2...... World Exchange continues to develop its work in other areas through the creative use of its base in Edinburgh, St Colm’s International House, where amongst other things, working with World Exchange we deliver our English language scholarship programme.

 

4.3...... In April Philip Woods (Secretary for International Relations) completed his term as Chairperson of World Exchange, but will continue to remain on the World Exchange Board as our representative.

 

5 International Ministry Exchanges

 

5.1 This international ecumenical programme enabling exchanges between church professionals has developed substantially in the last year following its partnership with the Council for World Mission to promote more North‑South exchanges.  Although still predominately assisting exchanges between Great Britain and North America it has also assisted United Reformed Church ministers to enter into exchanges with ministers in India.  Alongside this the programme now emphasises developing these exchanges as continuing ministerial education opportunities with participating ministers being encouraged to identify aspects of church life they wish to focus on and learn more about in another context.

 

5.2 Unfortunately the programme faces a major challenge in raising the funds it requires to sustain this expanded programme.  However, much work is being put into this, especially by our partners in the USA.  In October a meeting will be held of all the partner churches and agencies to review recent developments and consider the long term funding of the programme.

 

6 Scholarship Programme

 

6.1 During this last period the Scholarship Programme has been substantially reorganised in response to the expressed needs of the partner churches that have been its beneficiaries.

 

6.2 In particular, following a request from the Igreja Evangelica Reformada d’Angola to fund training programmes in Angola rather than bring people to the UK we have completely revised the programme with all our African partners following in‑depth consultation with all of them.  Thus, instead of bringing two people a year per partner church to the UK at a cost of around £7,500 we are funding a range of locally delivered education and training opportunities to a similar value and standard but which benefit between 60 and 120 people a year per partner church depending on the country.

 

6.3 Following the same principle we have also adapted our joint programme with the Romans 1:11 Trust, so that in this round we will together be supporting the training of pastors in the rapidly expanding Reformed Presbyterian Church in Uganda.

 

6.4 Alongside this the English language programme has continued to develop and we now offer once a year an opportunity for around 14 people from selected partner churches to come here and participate in an intensive English language training programme for church workers, which is followed by a placement in a United Reformed Church congregation and then a concluding get together for the participants in London, with an introduction to the wider work of the United Reformed Church.

 

6.5 To enable all this we have had to curtail the one‑year postgraduate scholarships, but again this decision was reached in consultation with our partners whose preference is for the developments outlined above.

 

7 People

 

7.1 The committee is well served by its members who have to undertake many more tasks and assignments over and above attending its meetings.  Conveners in particular can find themselves called upon to undertake some of the more difficult issues and we have been grateful for John Crocker whose commitment to our work has served us well.  We welcome John’s successor, Chris Baillie, and look forward to the gifts and insights he will bring to our work.

 

7.2...... With the close of this Assembly more wide‑ranging changes take effect as Sheila Maxey retires from her position, where she has done so much to develop the receiving mission partners programme (which forms the bulk of the committee’s work).  She will be much missed for her thoughtful creative insights and the pastoral care with which she has exercised this particular ministry.  In her place we will welcome Katalina Tahaafe‑Williams (Secretary for Racial Justice) recognising that the receiving mission partner posts are substantially connected to the ongoing development of multi‑cultural ministry and learning in the life of the United Reformed Church.

 

 

top

 

General Assembly Index