Record of the Congregational Union of
Scotland/United Reformed Church (UK) Liaison Committee 1990-2000
The Liaison Committee held
its final meeting on Tuesday 29 February 2000. At that meeting the
Convener, Revd Jack Dyce (who had also been co-chairman of the Joint
Negotiating Group) linked the opening devotions to the forthcoming union
and to the years of relationship between the two churches on which the
union was based.
Quite independently, the
Secretary, Revd Sheila Maxey, had prepared a paper for the meeting which
reviewed the work of the committee, as it was reflected in the 10 years of
minutes.
These two contributions are
here combined, not only for the record but as an offering to all those who
will build on the work of the Congregational Union of Scotland/United
Reformed Church (UK) Liaison Committee.
……. Throughout our
negotiations, we have been confident that the union will not mean
absorption or surrender but rather a sharing, a commitment to one another,
a desire to help one another be in a fuller sense. It has, of course, not
been an easy road. We have had disappointment; we in Scotland have
experienced schism.
When the first proposals
did not secure the required majority, nonetheless we knew that we could
not go back, we could not leave things simply as they were. We had
committed ourselves to one another and the time would indeed come, the
time of fulfilment. In Ros Lyle’s famous phrase, from a less successful
set of union talks, the requirement that we
‘fancied each other’ had been met. This committee has been a
key means by which that hope and commitment were kept alive.
And perhaps indeed the
earlier time was not right. The new set of proposals, crafted in a
different social and political and cultural context, envisage a way of
working together in three nations that, one hopes, will be a model for
others in the church and beyond.
Of course, the hope and
commitment is both to each other and beyond to a wider unity of the
church. Yet, for the present, it is we who are bound together in a
developing relationship and we ask God’s blessing on a unification that
is not completed on April 1, but rather moves forward and deepens as we
live together within one church fellowship.
As we read the story of
the marriage in Cana, let us in our hearts and minds sense Christ’s
presence with us and his blessing upon us in our coming together.
(Jack Dyce, Convener)
The
beginnings in 1990
The committee first met in
January 1990 at the Scottish Congregational College.
Those representing the
Congregational Union of Scotland were: Revds Alan Paterson, Morgan
Phillips, and Robert Waters (General Secretary) and Miss Carolyn Smyth
(representing the Scottish Congregational College and acting as secretary
to the meeting). Apologies were received from Mrs Sheena Paul
(representing the Women’s Union).
Those representing the
United Reformed Church were: Revds Raymond Bade, Mary Barr, David Hannen,
David Jenkins (Moderator of the Northern Synod who took the chair), David
M Taylor and Mrs Ruth Clarke (representing the Youth and Children’s Work
Committee) and Mrs Muriel Garrow.
Its purpose
was stated as: ‘to explore means of co-operation, making use of present
structures’ (a reference, perhaps, to the recent failure of the CUS
Assembly to obtain a large enough majority to pursue union with the URC)
The composition of the
committee reflected
then, and later, the expected areas of co-operation: training, women’s
work, youth work, and the Council for World Mission. The level at which
this was expected to take place was in relation, firstly, to the
Mid-Scotland District and then to the Northern Province. When Sheila
Maxey, URC Secretary for Ecumenical Relations replaced Muriel Garrow on
the committee in 1995 it was a signal, from the URC side, that the
relationship should be recognised as between the whole URC and the CUS. In
1996 the CUS changed some of its representation on the committee in order
to reflect both changes in its own structures and the need to have key
denominational staff on the committee. It was beginning to look again
towards union talks.
Themes
from the minutes
1 Training
Co-operation in this area
was considerable throughout the period
- a liaison group between
the Scottish Congregational College, the URC Ministries Committee and
Northern College was in existence before 1990.
- the CUS sent an observer
to the URC’s Integrated Training Review from 1990 on.
- in 1991 a CUS/URC joint
group on ministerial training was formed, and appreciation of the
flexible, ecumenical nature of the Congregational College’s courses was
expressed.
- in 1993 John Clarke, the
Principal of the College replaced Carolyn Smith on the committee.
- in 1995 both the CUS and
the URC embraced the new Training, Learning and Serving course with
enthusiasm.
- from 1995 CUS ministers
were invited to the Northern Province Ministers’ Summer School
- in 1996 the Principal of
the Congregational College and the URC Secretary for Ministries had one
(of several) meetings.
2 Women’s meetings
There was a slow but steady
increase in contact and cooperation between the Christian Women’s
Fellowship Annual Convention (formerly Churches of Christ) and the CUS
Women’s Bible Study annual meeting. Gradually attendance at one
another’s major events began to take place.
3 Youth work
Co-operation in this area
seems mostly to have been wider than just between the two churches
- through membership of the
CWM European Region both were involved in Youth in Mission workcamps.
- both were involved ACTS
youth events, and in CUS/URC/CF/UF ongoing support for a Christian Aid
project.
But ‘youth work’
appears only intermittently in the minutes as do the youth
representatives!
4 Sharing other
resources
- shared Vocations Days
with the Northern Province took place, most successfully in 1991 and
again, this time called ‘Fools for Christ’, in 1995.
- other Northern Province
resources such as the Music Bank and team support for the SCC Mission
Enabler were offered.
- the desirability of
exchange of magazines and other publications appears often in the minutes
but seems to have been difficult to achieve.
- another good idea, a
shared diary of events, seemed not to get off the ground.
5 Joint or
cross-representation
- in 1990 the CUS appointed
a member to the Mid-Scotland visitation team, which was assessing where
the six United Reformed churches stood after the failed union vote in
1988.
- in 1993 it was reported
that the CUS was representing the URC in some chaplaincy work and on some
ACTS bodies and that the CUS had included the URC churches in its Junior
Church Survey.
- once union talks were
opened in 1997, cross-representation began: CUS representatives were
invited to all URC Assembly Committees and the Mid-Scotland District was
invited to send representatives to the appropriate Area Councils.
6 Sharing news and
seeking closer
co-operation
- in the early years, this
focussed on the six URC churches and their relationships, some good, some
not so good, with their CUS neighbours. This period culminated in the
formation, in 1993, of Augustine United Church in Edinburgh.
- in the middle years, the
news, on the CUS side, was largely about the process of becoming a church,
and then dealing with the resulting painful split. On the URC side the
news was mainly about the Northern Province, of which, of course, the
Mid-Scotland was very much a part. The local focus for co-operation was
the Solway area and the relation of those two SCC churches to the
Cumberland District.
- most recently, the
emphasis has been on the CUS and Scotland as a whole, and, on the URC
side, news from the URC as a whole.
- between 1996 and 1998
there was an abortive search for an ecumenical officer who would also
minister to two URC congregations.
7 The Council for World
Mission
The minutes do not reflect
as much shared work as was, at first, expected.
- in 1996 there was a joint
visit of CUS and URC people to the CWM partners in Southern Africa.
- in 1995 there was a
shared celebration in Edinburgh of the bi-centenary of the LMS.
The
milestones on the road to union
September 1992
- the resolution before the CUS Assembly to form a church was not passed.
September 1993
- an amended form of the resolution was passe
From the moment of the
announcement of the vote, churches began to walk out. Eventually 27
churches left, at first to form the Association of Scottish Congregational
Churches, and then, individually, to join the Congregational Federation.
The Scottish Congregational Church began to form the Area Councils.
March 1996
- CUS representation on the Liaison Committee reflected the restructuring
centrally into Pastoral, Mission and Education committees with staff
responsible for each.
September 1996 –
the CUS Assembly voted to approach the URC to re-open union talks.
October 1996 -
the URC Mission Council, on behalf of the General Assembly, agreed to do
so.
The role
of the committee during the union negotiations
Once the Joint Negotiating
Group had begun work in January 1997, the Liaison Committee had a
complementary role, with two new elements:
- to facilitate communication and partnership between the two churches in all areas of
their life and work, and to move that beyond the Northern Province.
- to reflect on the work
of, and make suggestions to the Joint Negotiating Group.
In relation to the second,
the committee suggested that URC synods invite Area Council members for a
synod weekend, that there should be particularly close consultation
between the CUS and the Wales Synod, that Mid-Scotland URC speakers should
be invited to the Area Councils to explain the URC, and that there should
be better cross-representation between the Area Councils and the
Mid-Scotland District Council.
The Liaison Committee has
faithfully played its part in holding these two churches who ‘fancied
each other’ together both when their shared future was unclear and when
union came into view.
At the end of its 10 years
of life, the membership of the committee was as follows:
Representing the
Congregational Union of Scotland: Revds John Arthur (General Secretary of
the CUS), Jack Dyce (Chairman of the CUS, Principal of the Scottish
Congregational College and convener of the meeting), Ken Forbes, and Mrs
Sheena Paul.
Representing the United
Reformed Church (UK): Revds Mary Barr, Sheila Maxey (Secretary for
Ecumenical Relations and secretary to the meeting), Terry Oakley, and
David M. Taylor. During the 10 years other members came and went. Revd
David Jenkins, as Moderator of the Northern Synod, played a key role in
the life of the committee and in personally strengthening the bonds of
friendship between the CUS and the URC(UK). The thanks of both churches
are due to all those who served this committee faithfully and especially
to Mary Barr, Sheena Paul and David Taylor who served for the whole of its
life.
top