Five
Year Report 1989 - 1994
Year 2
Report by Simon Loveitt
THE SECOND YEAR
JULY 1990 – JULY 1991
My second year
in post began as we moved into our house in Old Trafford, within walking
distance of work, after almost a year in temporary accommodation in a huge
house, where we basically camped. We had an electric cooker but the house
was fitted with gas, so we used camping gas to cook on. The house had no
carpets, so we survived with what bits of carpets we had.
Work also
increased during the year. I became involved with new initiatives as well as
building on the various areas of work begun in year one. These will be
discussed under their various headings below.
PLAYSCHEME
Since the last
year, I had taken over responsibility for the playscheme. The playscheme
organiser for the past few years had needed a break. The organising of the
scheme and recruiting of staff seemed to be going well, but three weeks
before the playscheme was due to begin three of the four volunteers pulled
out, leaving just two of us. As I was due to go on holiday, I couldn't
recruit anyone else. So we changed the programme to minibus trips. There
were still a total of 52 children with whom we worked during this time. We
had very good feedback from the children who attended the playscheme.
CLEANING
This had been
an area of concern since I began work in 1989. The problem was that the
premises were never cleaned, although the building was used quite often by
the local community for meetings and of course by the Church for worship on
Sundays. I was really ashamed about the state of the building, particularly
during Tenants' meetings when children would come with parents, crawl around
on the floor and go away from the meetings with filthy clothes. As a result,
I suggested that the CRCW project and the Church ought to pay half each of
the costs of cleaning and that this should be done at least once a week.
This was agreed and the premises are in a much better condition now for the
relatively small cost of eight pounds per week.
ESTATE ACTION BID/PROJECT
An important
area of my work centres on the issue of housing. St. George's in Hulme,
where the Church is situated, managed to win an Estate Action Project
jointly funded by the Department of Environment and Manchester City Council.
This provided £11.5M over three years to improve some of the housing stock
in the area, including improving the multi-story flats by installing Closed
Circuit Television, new windows, electrics and employing 24 hour security
guards. This has made the premises more secure. Some of the maisonettes in
the area were being decapped (the top houses demolished creating terraced
houses), while others were modernised, which meant moving everyone out of
their houses for what was going to be nine months, while the work was
carried out. It turned out in fact that it was double that time. The
Tenants' Association, the City Council and myself were in negotiations for
many months to put together a package acceptable to all sides. All of us are
members of the Steering Group responsible for overseeing the project. This
group includes city architects, housing chief executives and direct works
departments of the City Council. There have been many problems with this
project. It was difficult to achieve a balance between ensuring the project
runs smoothly, ensuring that people were moved out of their homes on time to
allow the work to begin and dealing with people's lives, but it was good to
have this experience of small scale regeneration.
HOUSING OFFICE
Through the
Estate Action Project, which stipulated that services were kept as local as
possible, a Housing Office opened in St. George's to try to run the estate
more efficiently and to be more accessible to local people. Before Estate
Action, this estate was run from a Housing Office in Moss Side. Although
there were problems in the first year of its operation, such as a large
turnover of staff and the office being closed more often than it should be,
it was good to see a decentralisation of large Council departments. The
Park Office (as it is now called) holds monthly management meetings between
housing officers; local tenants, myself and Hulme's Tenant Liaison Officer
to try to keep on top of some of the difficulties which are encountered on
the estate.
YOUTH CLUB
This has
continued this year and the work has expanded, with a regular weekly
club for both
age groups and some residential work with the older group. The club has
tended to be increasingly detached, rather than building based, as there are
not enough volunteers to supervise the children adequately and the building
tends to suffer whenever they are in it. The building had not been designed
with youth groups in mind and hasn't many of the facilities one would expect
of a youth club. We therefore run a club mainly from minibuses and this
works much better. We were successful in applications to Children In Need
and the Home Office for money for projects with the young people - mostly
residential work.
PLAY FORUM
This forum is
made up of representatives from any group in Hulme that works with young
people, giving support to each other and campaigning on issues concerning
young people, youth work, or play provision. Although it has no regular
meeting, it tends to meet in the months leading up to playschemes.
EC BUTTER
This was an
area I tried to avoid after previous experiences with distribution of
butter, but I had the opportunity to have butter weekly for a four month
run. Members of the local community and church went door to door to collate
names and addresses and pension numbers. The butter was then collected by me
and distributed to the group of volunteers who then went door to door with
it. This was very successful, trouble free and produced a great deal of good
will within the community.
SHAWGREEN COMMUNITY AND
YOUTH CENTRE
In the centre
of this sub-area of St. George's exists a block of three shops, two of which
were empty. For many years, tenants had requested that there be something on
the estate for young people, such as a youth club. With this in mind, a
local tenant of Shawgreen and I were in negotiations with the City Council
to convert these shops into a community and youth resource. We held a public
meeting on the estate to discuss the proposals and how the centre could be
funded and run. Only one person turned up. I then wrote a letter to the
tenants on Shawgreen outlining the proposals and asking them to reply to me,
a local tenant, or one of the housing officers. We heard nothing, so another
letter went out with a tear off slip. We received no slips back. A petition
was then handed into the Park Office from tenants who lived around the
proposed site. Although they wanted somewhere for the young people to go,
they didn't want it next to their house. The tenants got their wishes and
the empty shops have been left.
THE CORNBROOK COMMUNITY
ENTERPRISE CENTRE
The Cornbrook
site, which includes the local housing office in its new buildings, has
other extensive buildings and grounds which should have become vacant in 18
months time (after Princess School, Moss Side leave to go back to their
rebuilt school which was burnt down over 4 years ago). There was extensive
work done by local tenants, myself and the Local Action Team of the City
Council to see what could be done for the benefit of the community with this
resource. The outcome was a package consisting of small business premises,
childcare facilities including after school activities, a playscheme, a
nursery and a cafe, which would serve lunches to pensioners. Although a
feasibility study had been commissioned and completed, nothing concrete can
be done until the school moves out, which is likely to be January 1995 at
the earliest. In reality, this project has been left until the school moves
out.
CHURCH DISCUSSIONS
REGARDING COMMUNITY ISSUES
Following the
confusion when I began work, concerning the different expectations of what a
CRCW's role is within the church and community, the discussions moved on in
the second year to looking at community issues and how together these could
perhaps be approached. Time was taken during Elders' meetings and the
quarterly Church meetings to discuss areas identified as important, such as
housing, the bus service, the elderly, shopping, drugs and others.
It was through
these meetings and the personal contact with members of the congregation,
that some of these areas were addressed, such as work with the elderly and
housing issues - to the fear and trepidation of the housing office!
HULME SPORTS PROGRAMME
MANAGEMENT
This project
employs three full-time workers who organise activities with and for the
community with the help of local volunteers. Areas of work include work with
the unemployed, women's work (such as self-defence courses, a health drop-in
and women's swimming), work with young people, with the elderly and
residential activities. I had a lot of contact with the Hulme Sports
Programme during my first two years, particularly with young people and as a
consequence, I was asked to join their management committee. The work of
this group is both interesting and varied.
CITY CHALLENGE
Hulme, until
the 1960's, had a population of over 30,000. This period of Hulme's history
is still fondly talked about. In common with other major cities in Britain,
Manchester was determined to create a modern Hulme and so proceeded with a
major slum clearance programme in the late 1960's and early 1970's. People
were moved to housing estates up to 30 miles from their homes in Hulme and
many were destined never to return.
What replaced
the old housing were new prefabricated buildings, the shells of which were
installed in a day in some instances. Deck access housing and the world
famous tCrescents' were built. These buildings were quickly seen
as a disaster.
During 1991,
Michael Hestletine had a brainwave! His idea was to topslice existing monies
totalling £350M already committed to other projects and in combination with
money from the private sector, to create the City Challenge programme.
Fifteen councils were invited to bid for the money and the £350M would be
divided between the ten successful councils, thereby creating competition.
Tenants, Councils and Government would work together to create a plan
acceptable to all.
Hulme applied
for this money and was successful in its bid. Part of the requirements for
the money was for the Council to consult fully with tenants in plans and
discussions regarding the future of Hulme. Due to the tight time-scales of
the original bid (six weeks from the announcement of the scheme to the
closing date for applications) the Council told the Government that full
consultation had taken place, when infact it had not. Since the original
application a limited company has been created, Hulme Regeneration Ltd and a
sub-committee of the Council, the Hulme Sub-committee, has been created to
make decisions regarding Hulme. Three 'forums' have been set up to advise
these two groups. They cover Housing, Economic issues and Social issues.
My
involvement with the process of the City Challenge is deliberately quite
small, as this could quite easily be a full time job by itself. I attend
regularly the Social Issues Committee, which advises the council on any area
of work not related to housing or the economic side of the City Challenge.
This committee has direct responsibility for a couple of projects in St.
George's in which I have an interest. These concern the environmental
improvements for the areas surrounding the Church and the improvements of
St. George's park. This committee is often frustrating, as there have been
some decisions about the future of provision for Adult Education which have
been taken unilaterally by the Hulme Sub-Committee. This has caused a lot of
bad feeling within the community.
At present
the City Challenge seems to be one of destruction and not regeneration. There has only been demolition in Hulme so far. No rebuilding has taken
place yet, although this will change soon when new housing is built on the
Hulme II, St. Wilfrid's estate.
Year 3 & 4
|