|
Some definitions of Community Development Work
Community - What do we mean?
The word ‘community’ is often used very loosely
in discussions about community development, usually to indicate something
smaller than ‘society’. However, the most commonly used definitions fall
into two main categories - communities of place, and communities of common
interest.
What
changes have occurred in Communities?
The past three centuries have seen major changes
to the notion of community. We have moved from a predominantly agricultural
and rural society, to an urban industrialised society, and now to a
post-industrial society. In this latter period of de-industrialisation,
there has been erosion of community life and a decline in civil society
organisations. But policy makers now believe that local communities are
best placed to tackle local problems and to make decisions that affect the
improvement of their areas. A number of factors have contributed to this
decline in community. Among these are: the evaporation of traditional family
networks; increased migration within and between countries; and geographical
polarisation between the haves and the have-nots.
Over the past 20 years, the poorest households
have not benefited from the general rise in wealth and living standards. Today, a majority of council and housing association tenants have no earned
income and are dependent on state benefits. On some estates benefit levels
exceed 80 per cent. Poor communities, already struggling against the odds,
are expected to cope with neighbours who need special care and support. A
minority of disruptive households can lead to high turnover of tenants which
destroys stable communities and has a detrimental effect on housing,
schools, health services, and the building up of local residents’ and social
groups.
Many believe that what is needed today is a
strengthening of face to face communities to meet the psychological needs of
belonging, practical needs of mutual care, and the political need for
participation and campaigning for rights and resources.
Community
Development - What do we mean?
There is a plethora of terms, often somewhat
confusing, relating to community development. The terms community
development and community work are for example frequently used
interchangeably, although they mean different things. Community development
is best used to refer to a process, or a way of doing something, which
entails the mobilisation, participation and involvement of local people on
common issues important to them. Community work, on the other hand, is
often used as a general term and refers to initiatives or activities that
are delivered at a local level that may not actively involve members of the
community as participants but merely as users of services.
The Community Work Forum (CWF), a grouping of
employers, trade unions, training providers and practitioners, produced
revised standards and definitions for community development work in 2002. These National Occupational Standards for Community Development Work are
outlined on the next page and the full version of the Standards can be
obtained from
www.paulo.org.uk or
www.fcdl.org.uk
Figure
I .The National
Occupational Standards for Community Development Work
Definition and Values
|
What is Community Development
Work?
The key purpose of community development work
is collectively to bring about social change and justice, by working
with communities to:
-
identify their needs, opportunities, rights
and responsibilities:
-
plan, organise and take action;
-
evaluate the effectiveness and impact of the
action
-
and to do all these in ways which
challenge oppression and tackle inequalities.
|
Community Development Work:
values
These outline the basic values and principles
for good community development work practice. The values that underpin
the standards are:
Social Justice
Working towards a fairer society that
respects civil and human rights and challenges oppression.
Self-determination
Individuals and groups have the right to
identify shared issues and concerns as the starting point for collective
action.
Working and learning together
Valuing and using the skills, knowledge,
experience and diversity within communities to collectively bring about
change.
Sustainable communities
Empowering communities to develop their
independence and autonomy whilst making and maintaining links to the
wider society
Participation
Everyone has the right to fully participate
in the decision-making processes that affect their lives.
Reflective Practice
Effective community development is informed
and enhances through reflection on action. |
Within
the Standards, Key Roles for community development workers are summarised as
follows:
Key role A - Develop working relationships with communities and organisations;
Key
role B - Encourage people to work with and learn from each other;
Key
role C -Work with communities to plan for change and take collective action;
Key
role D - Work with communities to develop and use frameworks for evaluation;
Key
role E - Develop community organisations and;
Key
role F - Reflect on and develop one’s own practice and role.
Other
useful definitions are found in ‘Methods and Themes in Community Practices’
(Glen 1993,). This text describes three forms of ‘community practice’. Often these three forms of ‘community practice’ are
in operation, in tandem, in one project, programme, or initiative.
top of page Glen’s
three forms of community practice are:
1. Community
Development, which
aims to promote community through the community members defining and meeting
their own needs. It uses creative and co-operative processes and
professionals work in non-directive ways.
2. Community
Action, which
involves campaigning for community interests and community policies. The
participants are socially excluded groups organising to gain more power over
their lives, using campaigning tactics on concrete issues. Professionals
assist as organisers mobilising for political action.
3. Community
Service, which
develops community organisations and services by trying to maximise
community involvement in management and delivery. Figure II.
Glen's typology of three forms of community practice
|
PRIVATE |
Community Development |
Community Action |
Community Services
Approach |
|
Aims |
Promoting community |
Campaigning for community interests and community policies |
Developing community oriented organisations and services |
|
Participants |
Community defining and meeting own needs |
Structurally oppressed groups organising for power |
Organisations./service users as partners |
|
Methods |
Creative and co-operative processes |
Campaign tactics on concrete issues |
Maximising community/user involvement and inter agency links |
|
Roles |
Professionals working in a non-directive way |
Activists/organisers mobilising for political action |
Service managers restructuring transactions with users |
Glen A:
(1993) Methods and Themes in Community Practice, in Butcher H., Glen
A; Henderson P; and Smith J: (1993) Community and Public Policy,
London, Pluto Press
The
building blocks for community development -What
makes for a good community?
These might be considered the ten key
characteristics of a good & well functioning community.
It will be:
(1) A learning community, where people and
groups gain
knowledge, skills and confidence through community activity.
(2) A fair and
just community, which upholds civic rights and
equality of opportunity, and
which recognises and celebrates
the distinctive features of its cultures.
(3)
An active and empowered community, where people are fully
involved and which
has strong and varied local organisations
and a clear identity and
self-confidence.
(4)
An influential community, which is consulted and has a strong
voice in
decisions which affects its interest.
(5) An
economically strong community, which creates
opportunities for work and
which retains a high proportion of its
wealth.
(6) A caring
community, aware of the needs of its members and in
which services are of
good quality and meet these needs.
(7) A green
community, with a healthy and pleasant environment,
conserving resources and
encouraging awareness of
environmental responsibility.
(8) A safe
community, where people do not fear crime, violence or
other hazards.
(9) A welcoming
community, which people like, feel happy about
and do not wish to leave.
(10) A lasting
community, which is well established and likely to
survive.
The
first four are about community empowerment, aiming to encourage communities
to be better able to cope with, challenge or change their situation. The
other six, known as the quality of life building blocks indicate the type of
community that community development tries to achieve.
[i]
top of page What
is meant by social capital?
To some,
community development is regarded as a process of building social capital or
social assets. It means the social resources provided by friends,
neighbours, families and organisations that help us get through life and
contribute to our physical, social and economic well being. A formal
definition of Community Capacity Building is ‘activities, resources and
support that strengthen the skills and abilities of people and community
groups to take effective action and leading roles in the development of
their communities’.
[ii] For example, being a
member of a Carers & Toddlers group can help young carers to develop
friendships and local contacts, which in times of need could provide a
shoulder to cry on and confidence, knowledge and support to cope.
There are
three types of social capital or social assets:
[iii]
Bridging
capital, which is inclusive and outward looking, encompassing people across
diverse ethnic, cultural and social cleavages. Examples of bridging social
capital include youth service groups, ecumenical religious organisations and
anti-racist organisations.
Bonding
capital, which is by choice or necessity inward looking, and tends to
reinforce the identity and confidence of homogeneous groups. Examples of
bonding social capital could include ethnic groups, homeless groups, special
interest groups and religious groups.
Linking
capital, which is the extent and nature of relationships and trust between
different decision-makers and those with power. Examples of linking social
capital could include between funders, a local authority and a residents
group who work together to improve the local area.
[i]
From the Social Exclusion Unit (1998) and Taylor, M; Barr, A; West, A: Signposts to Community Development. Community Development
Foundation, 1992, reprinted 2000.
[ii]
From Building Civil Renewal, Civil Renewal Unit, Home Office, 2003.
ccbr@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk
[iii] Federation of Community Development Learning newsletter,
Winter 2004 pages 6 & 7
|