|
The United
Reformed Church and 'extended membership' in a single congregation
Local Ecumenical Partnership
The present position
The present position on
membership in single congregation LEPs is stated very clearly in the
1998 guidance given by the Methodist/United Reformed Church Liaison
Group in the booklet How to make it work. Only those who come
into membership of the LEP on profession of faith can, at present,
have their names on both membership rolls. Otherwise, the
official position is that those members who were members of the two
congregations which united, and those who transfers from another
church at a later date, are either on the Methodist or the United
Reformed Church rolls. However, in practice, LEPs work with a
common roll of all the members and are proud of that prophetic witness
to the unity of the Church. It is clearly unsatisfactory that
the theory and practice diverge in this way.
The CTE 1997 report
The report of the 1997
Churches Together in England working group on Baptism and Church
Membership with particular reference to Local Ecumenical Partnerships
attempted to address this question when it made the following
recommendation:
"We recommend that the
Church/denomination, some of whose local churches participate in LEPs
and which is willing to consider the possibility of permitting
''extended membership' should, in consultation with other such
denominations, find ways of permitting it which are compatible with
its own understanding and practice of church membership." (para 85)
top
The FCC report in 2000
Early in 2000 the Free
Churches' Council convened a small working group, on which the United
Reformed Church was represented, to respond to that recommendation.
Its report was before the committee at its July 2000 meeting.
It described the URC position as follows: "it would be up to the local
Church Meeting in each LEP to admit into membership those in other
denominations who also desired membership of the URC."
The Methodist Conference
resolution in 2000
Meanwhile, the Methodist
Conference in June 2000 passed a first reading of an amendment to
their Deed of Union in order to be able to acknowledge members of
other Christian communions who are partners in a particular LEP as
also members of the Methodist Church. The proposed wording for
this reception into membership of the Methodist Church is:
N and N, you are members of other communions within
the Church of Christ. Do you wish also to be members of the
Methodist Church?
top
Conclusion
The
advice of the Doctrine, Prayer and Worship Committee, the Ecumenical
Committee and the Clerk to the General Assembly has been sought.
All broadly agree with the view expressed in the report of the Free
Churches' Council working group.
The
guidance offered to Local Ecumenical Partnerships by the Ecumenical
Committee is, therefore, as follows:
According to the Manual of the United Reformed Church, B.2 (1) (ix),
it is one of functions of the church meeting to decide on receiving
members by transfer, always on the advice of the elders' meeting whose
responsibility is 'to advise on the admission of members on profession
of faith and by transfer' (B.2 (2) (vi).
The
application of someone who is already a member of one of the other
churches in the Local Ecumenical Partnership should be made to the
elders' meeting (or its LEP equivalent) in terms such as:
"As a
member in good standing of the ……………….church, I wish also to be
admitted to the full privileges and responsibilities of membership in
the United Reformed Church."
The
formal acknowledgement within worship of such admission to membership
is a matter for local decision.
In
order that the statistical returns to the sponsoring churches of the
LEP should not be misleading, nor the LEP be expected to contribute
more than its financial share, each LEP should have an agreed
proportional division of the membership roll. This may be
altered from time to time during the developing life of the LEP.
Those
members of the LEP who do not wish to be members of all the churches
in the LEP are, of course, free to remain on the roll of their choice.
top
approved by the Ecumenical Committee Jan 01
|