You are in: Our Work > Youth > Developing local church projects addressing issues of Social Inclusion

  Mission Possible!
Developing local church projects addressing issues of Social Inclusion

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

A Theological Reflection

 

What is the United Reformed Church doing working in partnership with a Government Department?

 

This question is often put to those leading youth and children's work in our church. It is welcomed so that we may answer clearly and thoughtfully.

 

First of all, we perceive that God is present in all the world and is not restricted to working through the Church. Further, central to our calling as followers of Christ is to identify and to be where God is in God's world. And God is where truth is honoured and spoken and where love/justice is visible in intentions and actions. And God is where people suffer. We have this from the gospels and the letters.

 

In the present case the Department for Education and Skills has identified the need for a good society to address the harm done to individuals and to society itself when they are excluded from the enjoyment of its benefits, its freedoms and responsibilities. It recognises that it is unacceptable that any person's life should be prevented from expressing and enjoying its full potential and that community is diminished as well as the individual by their exclusion.

 

The causes of exclusion are mostly but not always known. Poverty, race prejudice, religious discrimination, disabilities, sexual orientation, criminal history, alcohol and drug dependence are but some of them and naming them is much easier than understanding them and their sometimes complex dynamics. Some, such as family relationships and the experience of physical or psychological abuse, may be less obvious and more subtle but just as damaging. In turn, communities often react to these with fear or suspicion thereby adding to a spiral of alienation.

 

The Christian knows that many of these causes are as old as human history and were current in the experience of the Hebrews and thus the life of Jesus and the New Testament Church. Books, such as the 'parables' of Jonah and Ruth, affirm God's demand for an inclusive community later described by Paul as one in which there is (in Christ) no longer Jew nor Gentile, male nor female, bond nor free. Thus, at the centre of the Christian Gospel stands the figure of Jesus who touches the untouchable, (notices the unnoticed, celebrates the non-celebrity) breaks with religious and cultural convention and cuts through established prejudice. Paul says that Jesus has 'come to those who were near and those were far off'. Furthermore he speaks of the followers of Christ being called themselves to this 'ministry of reconciliation'. The very Incarnation describes a God who journeys from the centre to the margins. Paul's own story was his proof.

 

In the light of this, the Church's ministry resonates strongly, in this instance, with the impulses of State and should welcome partnership in ventures which have at their heart the healing of alienation and the creation of a more inclusive community. It so happens that the examples which follow concentrate upon the life and potential of young people who are at different times and in different places, disillusioned, undervalued or simply discriminated against. Or sometimes, have simply met with a lack of interest or affirmation and are not so much 'pushed out' as simply 'not invited in'.

 

Perhaps the reader might ask, quite simply, if Christ is to be witnessed in the story of these ventures and to what effect. Beyond that, the reader might ask what venture they could imagine themselves being involved in which would evoke the same verdict.

 

Duncan Wilson; member of the URC/DfES Monitoring Group.

 

 

MISSION POSSIBLE

 

In October 1998 the United reformed Church submitted an application to the Department for Education and skills for funding:

 

'To undertake a one year feasibility study to explore new ways of working with local churches to engage with projects with priority groups including the disadvantaged (inner cities, rundown housing estates, rural areas); the disaffected (truanting, exclusions, at risk of offending) minority ethnic communities; those with disabilities.

 

The aim was to set up pilot schemes targeting social exclusion with the objective of providing specialist work in priority areas. The projects would relate to local community need and partnerships would be sought with other appropriate voluntary and statutory agencies'

 

An Education Consultant was invited to undertake a feasibility study for the United Reformed Church to establish the viability of the scheme in partnership with the Department for Education and Skills National Voluntary Youth Organisations Grant Scheme (DfES). The Youth and Children's Work Committee decided to accept the recommendations of the feasibility study and the projects were selected. Every local church was invited to submit an application for funding and 9 projects were selected which matched the United Reformed Church and DfES criteria. A monitoring group was established to safeguard the projects, liase with DfES, provide information and devise a model of working collaboratively with the central and local churches.

 

One central project was identified and a specialist conference for black young people was planned. This was held in the autumn of 2001.

 

A Stakeholder's Conference was also held so that all the project workers could meet and compare notes.

 

The monitoring group compiled a critique of the scheme and as a result the Youth and Children's Work Committee decided to register with the DfES and continue the partnership.

 

The DfES funding is restricted to England and although Wales and Scotland were involved in the initial consultation no projects were undertaken in these countries. However as a result of the critique the Youth and Children's Work Committee has included in its budget financing for Scotland and Wales so that they are integrated within future schemes. The outline for the 2002 - 2005 DfES scheme is in the appendix.

 

All the resources are listed in the Resource Appendix and may be obtained from the Youth and Children's Work Office

 

The Connexions Service will be based on eight key principles:

 

  1. raising aspirations - setting high expectations of every individual;
  2. meeting individual need - and overcoming barriers to learning;
  3. taking account of the views of young people - individually and collectively, as the new service is developed and as it is operated locally;
  4. inclusion - keeping young people in mainstream education and training and preventing them moving to the margins of their community;
  5. partnership - agencies collaborating to achieve more for young people, parents and communities than agencies working in isolation;
  6. community involvement and neighbourhood renewal - through involvement of community mentors and through personal advisers brokering access to local welfare, health, arts, sport and guidance networks;
  7. extending opportunity and equality of opportunity - raising participation and achievement levels for all young people, influencing the availability, suitability and quality of provision and raising awareness of opportunities;
  8. evidence based practice - ensuring that new interventions are based on rigorous research and evaluation into 'what works'.

The projects show the many different ways that these eight principles can work in practice.

 

 

What?

 

A partnership project between the United Reformed Church and the Department for Education and Skills working with Social Exclusion.

 

Why?

 

Explore new ways of working with local churches by setting up schemes targeting social exclusion.

 

Who?

 

Local churches and ecumenical groups.

 

How?

Locally identified projects working within URC and DfES guidelines reporting to a Monitoring Group.

 

Connexions?

 

Identify any relationship to Connexions.

 

When?

 

1st April 1999 to 31st March 2002.

 

Where?

 

Local churches and ecumenical partnerships within Synods in England.

 

Outcomes?

 

9 local projects. 1 central project. New model of working for future schemes. Critique of programme.

 

Challenges?

 

Collaborative working between the Church centrally and locally.

 

Resources?

 

Feasibility Study. Terms of Reference for Monitoring Group. Guidelines for Projects. Reporting, monitoring and evaluation. Critique. Handbook.

 

 

PROJECTS

 

Project Street Life

 

What?

 

An alcohol-free bar and a place for chilling out.

 

Why?

 

To have fun safely, a venue to meet friends away from the worlds of drugs and drink and a focus to give youngsters something life enhancing to do and to protect the community from youth crime and vandalism.

 

Who?

 

Well Street Methodist/United Reformed Church.

 

How?

 

An alcohol-free bar in the centre of Buckingham.

 

Connexions?

 

Through involvement with the youth forum.

 

When?

 

Friday and Saturday evenings and days during school holiday. Town centre venue provided by the church.

 

Outcomes?

 

Local partnerships with police, Town Council, youth forum and District Council. Support from local community groups and local churches. Developing popularity of the club amongst young people. Further training for staff members.

 

Challenges?

 

High expectations from local community. Increasing numbers mean employing and training more staff. Size of venue restricts numbers allowed to use premises. Spill-over problems.

 

Resources?

 

Good press and publicity. Involvement of local police.

Successful fund-raising.

 

 

Project Street Life opened in October 2000 with the aim of recruiting 50 young people in its first year. In fact, over 500 members are registered and the venue has become so popular, it is bursting at the seams and the project has opened its doors on an additional evening and days during the school holidays. The challenges have been with the young people who are unable to gain entry to the premises and the project is working with the police and the local community to devise ways of dealing with this. Both the Town and District Councils support the project as do the six other churches in the town. The initiative taken by Well Street Church was acknowledged and appreciated by the community and as a result, further funding has been donated to the project.

 

 

North Blackburn Youth Project#

 

What?

 

Outreach youth work for the marginalised in Shear Brow, Blackburn.

 

Why?

 

To reach out to young people not involved in the church and to provide a Buzz Club.

 

Who?

 

Revidge Fold United Reformed Church in conjunction with Lammack Methodists, Church of the Good Shepherd Catholic Church and St James Church of England.

 

How?

 

A converted basement in Revidge Fold United Reformed Church offering a youth club facility.

 

Connexions?

 

The project was specifically developed to help young people (aged 13-18) who had 'nowhere to go'. They were on the streets in the area served by churches and were causing nuisance and disturbance. The project gives them a base, contact with church members (and other adult volunteers).

 

When?

 

Two nights a week, Monday and Thursday.

 

Where?

 

Converted premises in Revidge Fold United Reformed Church.

 

Outcomes?

 

Successful recruitment of volunteers. Good relationships with Radio Lancashire. Support from Blackburn Council and Churches Together in North Blackburn.

 

Challenges?

 

Fund-raising. Cross community work providing a diverse programme of creative arts, sport and recreation facilities as well as study support in one venue with a wide age range.

 

Resources?

 

United Reformed Church Youth & Children's Work Training & Development Officer. Churches Together in North Blackburn. Volunteers.

 

Following an invitation from the Youth & Children's Work Committee of the United Reformed Church inviting churches to submit an application to join a social exclusion programme, Churches Together in North Blackburn met to discuss the possibilities of setting up a youth project in order to meet the needs of young people in the local community, especially those on the local housing estates. A youth and community worker was employed and research was undertaken with local young people to establish their priorities and needs. The venue was selected and a plan devised for the youth project to go ahead. The interest and involvement of the Mayor of Blackburn has encouraged the development of the project and he included the training and support of volunteers as part of his charitable work for his year in office. The Youth & Children's Work Training and Development Officer for the North Western Synod, was instrumental in assisting the project to devise its strategic and development plan and put in place policies, procedures and risk assessments for all areas of the work for the Management Committee, the Steering Group and for the training and development of staff, paid and unpaid, and the young people themselves. The Project aims to provide a variety of activities including art, sports and science and a variety of resources from the local community are provided by skilled volunteers.

 

 

Trinity Youth Project

 

What?

 

Involvement in outreach work in the community with social excluded young people.

 

Why?

 

The Church not only wanted to raise awareness of social inclusion, but wanted to provide practical support to the young people.

 

Who?

 

Trinity United Reformed Church, Abingdon.

 

How?

 

Networking with other churches and organisations to provide holistic youth services in Abingdon.

 

Connexions?

 

Youth workers engagement with young people in local schools.

 

When?

 

After school club on Fridays. Outreach work at Abingdon Bridge Drop-in Centre for young people. Visits to local schools. Youth groups within the Church community.

 

Outcomes?

 

Involvement in local schools. Development of junior youth club (8-11). Detached work with drugs related projects. Assisting at the mobile

drop-in centre. Drugs awareness work. Information to young people

in the community on issues including drugs, housing, relationships, family problems.

 

Challenges?

 

Not enough people and too much to do. Networking with the local authority services. Providing a service to both young people within

the Church and those outside the Church.

 

Resources?

 

The Church congregation and membership. Partnership arrangements with the local authority, Time for God and other churches. The Youth & Children's Work Training & Development Officer and Synod Youth Secretary.

 

Trinity Youth Project came about as a desire of the Church to involve itself in practical ways with young people not involved in the Church. By forming local partnerships with the local authority youth service, schools and youth information centres, the Church in Abingdon has found a way to sustain its work with young people in the Church and engage with other young people from the local community in a variety of venues. The initial funding from the Social Exclusion Project was sufficient to encourage the Church to put its ideas into action. The Church has dealt well with the tension between the different youth cultures by its total commitment and engagement with them and in the words of one of its elders, 'our Church will never be the same again, thank God'.

 

The original aim of providing a youth project has been transformed into a much wider initiative of working with young people in the community and the Church is fully committed to continue its vital outreach aspect of the project. It is significant that the planning and strategic development of the project was supported by the expertise of two Youth & Children's Work Training & Development Officers and the Synod Youth Secretary. With only small financial resources, the Church stepped forward in faith and not only does it support the youth work, but the further training of its practitioners. It is also significant that the Church, as well as being involved in its own local community, has also supported young people in further national involvement within the United Reformed Church.

 

 

Newquay United Reformed Church

 

What?

 

A late night open door drop-in centre.

 

Why?

 

To provide a safe venue for young people in Newquay with problems including homelessness, drug and alcohol misuse and those at risk of offending.

 

Who?

 

Newquay United Reformed Church.

 

How?

 

A drop-in centre on Friday and Saturday nights for vulnerable young people in Newquay.

 

Connexions?

 

The project youth worker visits schools.

 

When?

 

Friday and Saturday nights from 8 p.m. onwards until the last person

has left.

 

Where?

 

Inside the Church which is re-organised from its usual layout for services.

 

Outcomes?

 

Training in a foundation counselling course for volunteers. Training for voluntary youth workers using the AMAZE material. Partnerships with local schools. Networking with other organisations.

 

Challenges?

 

Risk assessments. Appropriate health & safety policies. Fund-raising.

 

Resources?

 

AMAZE. Youth & Children's Work Training & Development Officer. Other relevant training.

 

Newquay Drop-in Centre was an initiative of the United Reformed Church minister who was concerned about the lack of facilities for vulnerable young people in the town. The Church courageously decided to have an open door policy allowing young people to come into the Church in the late evening and early hours of the morning for refreshment and a listening ear. One of the challenges and key issues was the diversity of people using the facility. Many had mental health problems and needed intensive one-to-one listeners. The nature of the town itself meant that people came not just from the immediate locality, but also the itinerant travellers who stop off in Newquay for days and sometimes weeks. Members of the Church volunteered to work in the drop-in and undertook a basic foundation counselling course. Some of them are now undertaking further training. The Church set out to achieve the five marks of mission with its project and has had to work hard to balance its mission with the necessity of providing a safe and secure drop-in centre. It strives to retain its integrity in both areas and has devised a behavioural policy which is displayed in the Church. The workers have engaged with the local community police officer who is supporting the work and encouraging working together. From the original vision of a drop-in centre, further work has developed including a Thursday night session where youngsters are allowed to experiment with musical instruments, schools work with visits to the two local secondary schools, and a mentoring project. The sessions have been organised into early evenings for 9-13 year olds and from 9 p.m. onwards, 14-18 year olds. The 18+ are now being worked with individually outside the drop-in as there are many with very deep and complex needs. The projects operates with one paid full-time worker and approximately 20 volunteers working on a rota basis. Funding initially was quite difficult. However, successful applications have been made to the Church Urban Fund and other donations have been secured providing sustainability for the project for another 3 year period.

 

 

Lewes Road United Reformed Church

 

What?

 

Basic food hygiene training for the learning disabled.

 

Why?

 

To involve the learning disabled in the local community.

 

Who?

 

Lewes Road United Reformed Church and the local community association.

 

How?

 

To involve the young adults in working in the community lunch club.

 

Connexions?

 

Outside the age range, even for young people with special needs.

 

When?

 

One day a week.

 

Where?

 

In the local Church lunch club facility.

 

Outcomes?

 

Three young people successfully completed their basic food hygiene training. Continued involvement with the lunch club. Second group of learning disabled adults commenced food hygiene training.

 

Challenges?

 

Recognition that those with learning disabilities can play an active part in the community.

 

Resources?

 

Dedicated worker. Successful lunch club. Involvement of Social Services.

 

Lewes Road United Reformed Church already runs a successful lunch club for the local community. An approach was made by Social Services requesting the Church to provide training within the lunch club for young adults with special learning needs to undertake basic food hygiene training as well as work experience in the lunch club. The DfES agreed that if the young people were registered with special learning needs, then they could be included within social exclusion projects. The young people had a dedicated worker who worked with them on the basic food hygiene certificate. They were also involved in preparing and serving the food at the lunch club. The local community learned that those less able than themselves were capable of being involved in the community in very practical ways. The Social Services Department recognise the value of the work the Church was engaged in and sought its assistance in providing a service. Networking between the Church, the local community association and the statutory agencies developed the credibility of the work being undertaken. The original 3 young people are now involved in the lunch club on an ongoing basis and new trainees are currently undertaking their training for the basic food hygiene certificate. These new people are all over 25. However, the provision of a facility for training and work experience is highly regarded and, although the scheme has moved on to working with young adults, it has opened doors for others excluded from the day to day life of the community.

 

 

West End Church

 

What?

 

Work with refugees and asylum seekers.

 

Why?

 

The Church recognised there was a need in the community for the many refugees and asylum seekers living in the area with little support.

 

Who?

 

West End Church working together with other agencies.

 

How?

 

Outreach work with minority ethnic communities focusing on secondary school age young people.

 

Connexions?

 

Support for local schools from the practitioner.

 

When?

 

Daily.

 

Where?

 

At the local refugee Centre, on the local estate.

 

Outcomes?

 

Regular contact with families. Links with professional agencies.

Working with local schools. Activity days.

 

Challenges?

 

Language barrier. Adverse publicity for refugees and asylum seekers. Necessity of working with families rather than just their young people.

 

Resources?

 

Links with other professional agencies. LEA. Local schools. West End Refugee Project.

 

The minister of West End United Reformed Church had been closely involved in setting up the West End Refugee Service. Together with the Church membership, he recognised the need for a worker to provide a specialist service to families with young people who were excluded from the usual community activities. The worker was involved in all aspects of the families' involvement with the community, but particularly with aiding the young people into education, providing them with information about local resources, activities, and leisure sports and social activities, and integration into the community. Referrals were made from other agencies. One of the key issues was that the worker often found herself involved with other refugee and asylum seekers in the community who appeared to have little contact with the local services. She often found when she visited families to discuss the needs of the young people, that other neighbours were seeking her assistance in all matters of daily living from explaining legal matters, rents, benefits, etc., to how to ask for the food they needed when they did not have the English names for the items. The project worked closely with the West End Refugee Service who made frequent referrals whenever they had families with young people. There was also a good relationship regarding sharing information, concerns and resources, and a consolidated approach to supporting families. 'Activity Day' provided the opportunity for new experiences and also for travelling further afield than the small local area in which the young people are normally confined. The Church had recognised a gap in the provision of services and although the Church building was not in a place which could be easily utilised, it managed to provide the service and support focusing on young people with a desperate need.

 

 

New Street Community Centre

 

What?

 

An ecumenically supported project working with young people on an impoverished estate in St Helens.

 

Why?

 

To provide young people with a positive experience of volunteering.

 

Who?

 

A Christian youth worker supported by a local ecumenical project working in a community centre.

 

How?

 

Young people volunteering their time on a range of community projects working with a mentor and gaining 'money can't buy' type rewards.

 

Connexions?

 

Credits for personal portfolios.

 

When?

 

Daily on an ad-hoc basis.

 

Where?

 

At New Street Community Centre.

 

Outcomes?

 

Positive volunteering experience for young people. Informal networking between the churches. Raising an awareness of need in the local community.

 

Challenges?

 

Lack of money. Practical involvement of church members.

 

Resources?

 

Resource from the 'Dream Scheme' Project, Sheffield. Community Centre staff. Youth & Children's Work Training & Development Officer. Local United Reformed Church minister.

 

The Christian youth worker working in New Street Community Centre was aware of a project previously run in Sheffield called 'the Dream Scheme' and together with the other partner agencies at the Community Centre realised this was an opportunity to involve young people in a positive volunteering experience. They worked on a whole range of community projects including aluminium can recycling, conservation work, working in the Community Centre, gardening on the estate. The young people were awarded points, ten points equalling one hour's work in the scheme and every ten points could be traded for 'treats'. There were initial difficulties in recruiting volunteers to act as mentors but once this was resolved, young volunteers worked in supporting the After School Club, running the tuckshop and organising play activities. 30 young people participated and of these 6 achieved the Council for Voluntary Service Certificate for Volunteering.

 

 

Dorchester United Reformed Church

 

What?

 

A parent and family outreach project working with 'at risk' young families.

 

Why?

 

A concern about young parents and their children and a need for good parenting.

 

Who?

 

Dorchester United Reformed Church.

 

How?

 

Providing specialist training for church members to run courses in good parenting.

 

Connexions?

 

No involvement.

 

When?

 

From September 2001.

 

Outcomes?

 

Successful training for the mentors. Provision of support for 'at risk' families.

 

Challenges?

 

Recruiting volunteers. Encouraging young families to participate.

 

Resources?

 

STEPS (Steps To Excellence and Personal Success)

Pacific Institute, Seattle 981041-1051, USA

 

The programme consists of twelve 2 hour sessions facilitated by 2 trainers. The STEPS programme was supplemented with other related parenting materials. The underlying principles are Christian and the programme is a pro-active approach targeted at young parents and their families enabling problems of social disaffection to be tackled at source. The young people were supported as part of the family based learning project. The project was a creative initiative undertaken by the Church in response to an identified need and as an outreach strategy of the Church and its millennium vision.

 

 

Cedarwood Trust - Video Project

 

What?

 

Cedarwood Trust Ecumenical Project - Northern Synod.

 

Why?

 

Provision of youth work on an impoverished and refurbished estate in Meadow Well.

 

Who?

 

Unemployed young people, users of Community Centre, local residents.

 

How?

 

Plan, make, produce and market a video showing the effect of poverty

on crime.

 

Connexions?

 

Association with local technical college for accreditation for young people undertaking the project.

 

When?

 

During the Spring and Summer of 2001.

 

Where?

 

Inner city. On the Meadow Well estate and in neighbouring Jesmond,

a well off, neighbouring area with high class shopping and housing.

 

Outcomes?

 

3 young people working with professional youth work video company, employment opportunities, public showing of video, involvement of the local community, MP, Councillors and other funders.

 

Challenges?

 

Revision of programme because of insufficient funding. Adverse publicity for one of the young people involved and his subsequent imprisonment.

 

Resources?

 

Professional video. Professional youth work company. Access to local MP and Councillors to raise issues. Involvement of the whole community.

 

The Cedarwood Project is an ecumenical, community project working in Meadow Well, North shields. The United Reformed Church has been involved for a number of years and a URC Minister has in the past held the post of Director.

 

The young people involved in the project wanted to highlight the difficulties of living on an estate, in poverty and stigmatised by previous events in the area, namely riots a number of years ago. Despite all the resources poured into physical improvements in the area following those riots, very little had changed for the people themselves.

 

The young people decided to produce a video investigation into the effects of poverty on young people and its relationship to crime. Two young men and

 

a young woman worked with a professional youth worker from Swing Bridge Video, a company producing educational material with and for young people, for a year, planning, preparing, researching, interviewing and producing the video - 'Poverty - It's a Crime'.

 

They contrasted their experiences and those of young people in Scotswood and Byker, both deprived areas, with those of people from Jesmond and North Shields. Young people give their views on poverty, school, crime, drugs, CCTV and policing on the estates. Themes of making choices and taking responsibility are presented within ideas of what type of youth and community provision would work best for young people.

 

The challenges were many not least adverse publicity and the difficulties of working with young people almost without hope and who had no expectation of being taken seriously, but the project culminated in a public showing at a major cinema in North Shields attended by local voluntary and public sector organisations, the local MP (who is interviewed on the video), participants, residents, local trusts and the general public. The United Reformed Church Synod and its Moderator supported the project throughout from inception to completion and their encouragement and interest played an instrumental part in the project.

 

The video is an imaginative and unique insight into young people's lives and is for use in schools, youth clubs and community training context. It can be bought or hired from The Cedarwood trust, 43 Avon Avenue, Meadow Well, North Shields, Tyne and Wear, NE29 7QT or speak to The Moderator of the Northern Synod.

 

 

Stakeholder's Conference

 

What?

 

Central Church conference for stakeholder's within the scheme.

 

Why?

 

Bring together all the participant groups to share information, learning and challenges.

 

Who?

 

All project leaders and workers, Monitoring Group, DfES, Secretary for Youth Work and YCWT's.

 

How?

 

3 day residential conference.

 

Connexions?

 

Identification of opportunities for future involvement.

 

When?

 

Autumn 2001, 18 months into the projects.

 

Where?

 

Central venue (Derbyshire) in residential conference centre.

 

Outcomes?

 

Networking. Evaluation of scheme. Feedback from projects. Involvement of DfES.

 

Challenges?

 

Achieving a common understanding of the scheme for participants of different backgrounds, churches and communities. Finding a time and place convenient to all.

 

Resources?

 

Evaluation from the conference.

 

Providing an opportunity for key personnel from the various projects to meet with each other and share experiences was always recognised as good practice. The diversity of ways in which the funding was being used by the many different projects gave great heart to those involved and allowed them to be even more creative in their responses to the needs of local young people.

 

Providing peer support and encouragement, as well as theological reflection on their aims, objectives and methodology, meant that those attending returned to their projects with renewed vigour and a deeper understanding of the roles local churches could play in meeting the needs of young people.

 

The conference also gave stakeholders the opportunity to meet with personnel from the Monitoring Group and the DfES.

 

 

 

Black and Dynamic (BAD) weekend

 

The United Reformed Church

 

Social Inclusion Project

The 'Black and Dynamic'

(BAD) weekend

 

The first in a series of weekend activities focusing

on work with young black people

 

16th - 18th November 2001

 

 

U.R.C. SOCIAL INCLUSION PROJECT

THE 'BLACK AND DYNAMIC' (BAD) WEEKEND

 

The first in a SERIES OF WEEKEND ACTIVITIES FOCUSING ON WORK WITH YOUNG BLACK PEOPLE

 

 

16th -18th NOVEMBER 2001

 

Background to the weekend

 

The initial funding for this event was provided by developmental youth activity funds from the DFES as part of their partnership work with voluntary sector youth organisations, aimed at increasing aspects of social inclusion. Having made a successful bid, this initiative, within the URC context, translates itself into a number of challenges. The aim of increasing the participation of young black people within URC youth activities has been a high priority, hence the particular focus of this weekend. Within this report the term 'black' is used to define people from African, African-Caribbean, Asian, and other (visible) communities, people of dual heritage, who may experience racism. This is in line with usage of the term by the National Youth Agency and its publication 'Shabaab', a magazine that seeks to promote and celebrate black young people's action.

 

Earlier work in this area has seen youth exchange activities on an international basis focused solely on young black members of the URC (1993), and a number of joint initiatives with black Methodists culminating in summer activity theme-based programmes (1998/2000). The urgency for this kind of work was also underlined in the development plans co-ordinated by the URC's multicultural/multiracial development worker, July 2000. These comments reflected the need for an ongoing commitment to work in this area, as depicted by the FURY Review in 1998:

 

'We recommend that FURY be re-launched with the same name and inclusive approach, but with a new image emphasising diversity and inclusiveness'

 

AIMS/OBJECTIVES, PROGRAMME* AND LEARNING OUTCOMES

 

The aims of this event were to provide space for young black people to share stories and explore their faith and culture. It would also provide some opportunity for them to comment on the kinds of future youth work activities that they would find most helpful within the context of the URC.

 

The weekend's objectives included:

 

  • Bibliodrama - role play and reflection on Bible-based drama activity
  • Formulating time-lines and sharing our spiritual journeys
  • Sharing ideas via a community profile of the issues - social, theological - in the areas where we live
  • Sharing in a percussion workshop aimed at building teamwork
  • Taking part in creative workshops around dance, drama, music and writing
  • Putting together a plan for networking and future activities
  • Conducting an evaluation
  • Drawing aspects of the weekend together within a final celebration.

The learning outcomes focused on:

 

1. increased self-awareness and ability to assess own faith journey

 

2. ability and confidence to articulate future ideas, activities and programmes

 

3. to both give and receive support through being part of a network

 

* See appendix for full programme outline

 

 

THE GROUP

 

The group's profile was as follows: 10 women and 10 men, whose ages ranged from 15 to 24. There was a mixture of those at the latter end of their school careers; those currently looking for work; those who had experienced significant periods of unemployment; and others who were at the early stages of chosen careers through training (University courses, etc.,) or direct employment.

 

The group was not fully representative in terms of attracting young people from different parts of the country, the North in particular. Those who did attend came from the West Midlands area, the Home Counties and London.

 

 

PROJECT VENUE

 

The project location was suggested because of its unique context. It was significant because Dunford House was originally a stately home belonging to Richard Cobden, an anti-slave campaigner during the 1800s. This in itself proved useful in referring to historical aspects of changing ideas and priorities within British society. Also, being the only group using the house this weekend, it also enabled a greater sense of cohesion to occur.

 

 

TRAVEL

 

The group used two main forms of transport: minibus and train. We were fortunate in that the minibus users came from the same area, and were able to co-ordinate travel together. The train users experienced more difficulties, whilst end-of-week commitments and variable train connections led to some members not arriving until late Friday evening.

 

 

ACCOMMODATION AND FOOD

 

Dunford House was identified early on, having been used extensively by one of the planning team. The setting of the house and its facilities enabled planning of a wide range of activities, including time out in Portsmouth on Saturday evening.

 

The location was also accessible for other resource people based in London and the South. Having the facility to ourselves meant that there were lots of rooms for large and small group activities, and for creating library/resource areas where materials could be explored at leisure. The grounds and country setting also proved useful when it was necessary to change the mood by taking walks and breaks in the nearby woods.

 

Having no responsibility for food preparation or washing up, etc. gave more time for the group and the programme. There was a varied menu of freshly prepared items in plentiful amounts. The quality and range of choice was exceptional and equally the ability of the staff to take on board different dietary requirements, and the style in which they looked after us, added to the enjoyment of the weekend.

 

 

HEALTH AND SAFETY

 

A long preparatory period prior to the event was useful and enabled us to do a pre-event visit and undertake a range of risk-assessments relating to the building and local amenities.

 

 

GROUP FEEDBACK AND EVALUATION

 

The group was lively as indicated by the range of comments below:

 

1. What was least useful about this weekend and why?

  • The hour in Portsmouth before the bowling
  • The agenda was packed up
  • Racist remarks by onlookers made me feel unwanted in Portsmouth
  • Nothing
  • Our Communities
  • There is not enough time given to reflect on both yourself and the sessions given (too much to do in one day and not enough time to do it)
  • The percussion workshop, because I didn't understand why we were doing it and the connection to the identity and culture
  • We had to wake up too early
  • The agenda was so packed we were rushed off our feet
  • 2. What was most useful about this weekend and why?

     

  • The sessions were most useful because they taught me a lot of things
  • Meeting other black youth within the URC - becoming aware of the fact that others exist - 'communicating' with others/'working together' and coming up with fantastic final products coming from such different backgrounds
  • Getting together and worship with other URCs
  • When everybody spoke about their life - very touching
  • New people from different backgrounds
  • Hearing other people's stories
  • Session 4 - you got to know people's thoughts and things you didn't knowabout each other
  • The ability to gather and unite as a group, and spiritually by yourself; the free time away allows you to refresh back into the hectic lifestyle
  • Sharing stories, because we learned things about people that we wouldn't have already known
  • Getting to know other people
  • Location, because it was quiet and gave you time to reflect
  • The location. It was far away and allowed total change of scenery and relaxation
  • We got to meet and interact with youth from other Churches.
  •  

    3. Which session was most useful to you? Explore reasons, content and structure

     

  • Sharing stories was because I learnt a lot about people
  • Telling our history was good, because some people had same history as you
  • Sharing stories - it was amazing that the group had come to a point where we could be open and honest with each other
  • The Identity and Culture
  • Session 5, sharing stories - very touching
  • Morning devotions - a time to worship God in songs and praise him
  • Reflective celebration: the ability to share your work with others in an open environment
  • Reflective celebrations: gave me a chance to see what other people could do
  • Sharing stories
  • Instrumental, because I love music and it was lively
  • Preparation for celebration; I got to do a bit of poetry.
  •  

    4. Why do you think this type of event is important?

  • Because it brings the URC black community together as one
  • So people can make new friends and get to know about themselves
  • Helps to give you a wider picture, beyond your own church situation
  • Because it brings a sense of belonging and recognition in the URC
  • Because we have the weekend to try and find ourselves
  • To give young black people support in church, and just to get together
  • To bring black people together in unity and to meet others you can relate to
  • Because without these 'sessions' the URC will not be and will not have the texture of bonding that the URC needs
  • Because it lets us know that we are not alone in our faiths and beliefs, and it gives us the chance to encourage and be encouraged
  • Because you get to learn new things
  • It unites the young and dynamic young black
  • Christians in the URC
  • Because it teaches the youth important lessons about expression and culture.
  •  

    5. Would similar opportunities in the future assist your spiritual development?

  • Yes x 8
  • Yes, very much
  • Definitely
  • Yes, because it would be nice to be able to grow and understand that growth in a safe environment.
  •  

    6. State one positive benefit of the weekend for:

     

    (a) you;

  • I learnt some Christian values and morals
  • Telling about myself to other people, and they were giving advice
  • Development of friendships
  • Getting to make Christian friends from other URCs
  • Learnt about other youths my age, and they're quite similar
  • Meeting new people
  • New adventure, new experience
  • Just the chance to get away and reflect
  • Playing my music
  • (b) your local church/community;

  • getting young black people together
  • I am going to tell others how good this weekend was
  • We go back refreshed and revitalised
  • My church will benefit from the youths from other churches making friends
  • We are more close
  • Sharing what we learned
  • They now have more educated kids and can benefit from what we were taught.
  • (c) the wider church

     

  • Youth seeing that there is a 'wider church' beyond their own individual church
  • Brings unity
  • To develop connections throughout England
  • Other black people will learn about this event and come to it through the people that have been
  • Letting others know that black young Christians can do things.
  • 7. Do you have any other comments about this event...?

  • Please can we bring a West Indian cook?
  • You have done a very good job! Thank you very much.
  • The event was well co-ordinated and has helped the young black youths to feel a sense of value.
  • Thank you very much
  • Good. I would like to come again
  • I thought a black person, coinciding with the whole point of us being here should have led the percussion session.
  • It was good overall, and it would be good to have it again I became quite emotional when I saw the achievements of the reflective celebrations. It showed a better picture of the person
  • It was wicked man! Thank you.
  •  

    LEADER'S EVALUATION AND COMMENTS

     

    Despite limited time, our feelings as project workers were that, the initial aims of the weekend were met and the main learning outcomes achieved. Other observations are noted in the following points:

  • For many this was the first chance to meet in a mono-racial setting. This enabled a degree of trust to develop quickly, and for a deep level of sharing on very personal issues to occur.
  •  

  • Many of the informal discussions and activities highlighted a wide range of skills that young people only get to contribute to the Church on a partial basis. This suggests that support and encouragement on personal development/choices and decision-making are often taken in conjunction with significant others, e.g. youth workers and sympathetic teachers/ministers, who act as 'gateways' into the wider church.
  •  

  • All within the group were able to demonstrate a level of confidence in participating within activities that were critically assessed by their peers. For example the creative and self-assured approach to the drama, rapping and singing activities were striking. Equally, the writing workshop and comments on personal journeys so far reflected evidence of a healthy, critical self-awareness.
  • Many of the learning outcomes reflect important issues and concerns. Our main concern, to explore aspects of racism within church and society, obviously requires sensitive handling when working with a mixed ability group. The infrequency of an event like this has raised some important questions about URC youth work provision and its ability to meet the needs of a particular group of young people that it purports to serve. Related to this are other issues, such as how effectively national events support and complement local activities, and the degree to which topics covered in this weekend should indeed be explored far more widely.

     

    Our observations and practice throughout the weekend demonstrated that young people are willing to explore topics that, within church contexts, are often perceived as taboo. These include:

     

    1. being able to integrate ideas of being black with a positive self-identity, against a wider backdrop of mainly negative stereotyping in society;

     

    2. developing a theology that affirms their dignity and provides a basis for appreciating difference and accepting others;

     

    3. preparing to deal with the structural/interpersonal realities of race and racism, and how such aspects may impinge on their future hopes and aspirations; and

     

    4. receiving support and encouragement from other young people and adults who are prepared to be frank and open about the difficulties and issues they face within this area.

     

     

    RECOMMENDATIONS

     

    In the likelihood that funding could be secured to repeat such an event, it would be useful if the following recommendations were adopted:

     

  • Clearer communication and realistic time commitments be agreed by the various URC 'stakeholders', e.g. Racial Justice Office, Youth Work Department, World Church and Mission, Church and Society.
  • That practitioner time and energies be realistically mapped out, i.e. that co-workers have a clear basis of support for undertaking this work, and that this be reflected in adjustments within their other work responsibilities.
  • Consideration is given to holding day and 24-hour events in different regions covered by the United Reformed Church.
  • That partnership work be explored with other groups, e.g. other ecumenical bodies and voluntary sector agencies interested in working alongside young people.
  • That long-term consideration is given to effective ways of maintaining contact, learning and growth on an inter-personal basis. This may lead to the devising and establishing of a mentor scheme, which would directly address the issues of trust and support so vital for work in this area.
  •  

    FOLLOW-UP ACTIVITIES

     

    Recognising that monies from the DFES have funded this programme, it may be important that a thorough examination of the national youth work budget is made to determine whether such activities can be funded without monies from outside sources. Assuming that this type of project work is incorporated into the national provision, it would be important to attempt the following:

  • Consider ways of working across URC National Committees so that further funding and resources may be secured. This could involve a range of creative initiatives and project work between, for example, the Racial Justice, Youth and Children's Work, Church & Society and World Church and Mission departments. This type of inter-departmental activity almost seems a natural development, given the nature of race and racial justice activities and the ways they can manifest themselves at different levels of society.
  • That the Youth & Children's Work Committee keep such work as a standing agenda item so that progress can be easily identified, monitored and evaluated.
  • That contact be kept with the weekend's participants through the development of a network/news-sharing process and that they are kept on mailing lists for other national events, e.g. FURY Assembly.
  • Prioritisation of such work as an objective for the Secretary for Youth Work, who could make particular efforts to maintain contact and be supportive of workers who are developing initiatives in this area.
  • A national gathering or a more localised/regional day be organised for those young people and youth leaders who were unable to get to the event, but who would be interested in work on the themes and ideas in this area.
  • That links to be made with bodies such as CWM. This could lead to discussions around mission strategies in this area, and ways we can share and learn from member churches in similar situations.
  •  

    THANKS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     

    We would like to record our thanks to the following individuals and groups:

  • Lesley Anne Di Marco, Secretary for Youth Work
  • Heather Latimer, PA to the Secretary for Youth Work
  • The Thames North and West Midlands Synods for providing project workers:
  • Lorraine Downer, Youth Worker High Cross URC, Tottenham
  • Wal Warmington, Youth & Children's Work Trainer for the
  • West Midlands Synod
  • Tim Barnes, Consultant on the URC Social Inclusion Project
  • Katalina Tahaafe-Williams, Secretary for Racial Justice
  • Highcross URC, Tottenham
  • Department for Education and Skills - DfES
  •  

    APPENDICES:

     

    1. Participants -

     

    Noel Adam

    Yemy Adedipe

    Karen Campbell

    Nicole Carter

    Kismet Cooper

    Phil Ferdinand

    Sam Johnson

    Audrey Lukwago

    John Macaulay

    Naomi Macmeekin

    Cory Morris

    Rochelle Morris

    Dorothee Munyaneza

    Brenda Olam

    Samuel Seasay

    Matthew Singh

    Simon Smith

    Andrew Williams

     

     

    2. BAD WEEKEND, 16-18 NOVEMBER 2001: WEEKEND OUTLINE

     

    Friday, 16th November

     

     

    9.00 House tour

    9.30 Ground rules and

    why we are here

    10.00 Trust games

    10.30 Reflections

    10.45 Video

     

     

    Saturday, 17th November

     

    8.00 Breakfast

    8.45 Devotions - 'Why R we here?'

    11.00 Session 1 - Identity, Biblical drama/reflections

    Tea break

    Session 2 - Our Communities

    1.30 Lunch

    2.30 Session 3 - Percussion Workshop

    Groups 4 - Reflective Celebration

    (Dance, Drama, Music, Poetry)

    4.30 Tea break

    Session 4 - Sharing Stories

    6.30 Dinner

    7.30 Leave for Portsmouth (free time, let's chill, bowling)

    Arrive back to Dunford House

     

    Sunday, 18th November

     

    8.00 - 9.00 Breakfast

    9.30 Reflections

    Session 5 - Planning Celebration Worship (poetry, music, drama, dance)

    11.30 Tea break

    Session 6 - What next?

    Session 7 - Sharing stories and group evaluation

    1.00 Lunch

    Reflective Celebrations

    Session 8 - Personal evaluations

    3.30 Refreshments and depart

     

     

    3. Pieces from the Creative Writing workshop

     

    Creative Writing Pieces

     

    Matthew Singh

     

    I see love I see pain I see a man making love again

    I see rich people I see poor people I see another man on the floor again

    I see light I see dark I see another woman getting rape again

    I see boy dem I see my peep's get lock away

     

    Noel

     

     

    My Choice

    My Pastor gave me the option

    I made the choice

    To go on this experience

    And to lift my voice

    We gathered together

    The URC's

    As one black Christian family

    We've learnt a lot

    And teach a lot

    This weekend has deepened our thoughts

    To respect each others

    For this deep memorable cause

     

    Yemi

     

     

    Deception Reality?

    Insane.... Quiet, keeping still

    Emotions pointless not knowing what I feel

    'help', asking questions unanswered

    Paranoid.... Get a grip, take my thoughts for granted

    For instance is this life a punishment

    Live only to die under judgement

     

    John

     

    I flick on the news

    So many sterotypical views of black youths

    And its only up to us to make moves

    Put down the guns, pick up your diploma

    And instead of going felts, take a nice trip out to croma

    Black people got to start uniting, and stop the fighting

    Once we do that, I guarantee we'll be smiling.

     

    Cory

     

    After shocks and before shocks

    High grade smoke and yoghurt pots

    Comfy rooms run cold, on equal ground

    Friendship is made as youth organisations break ground like garden spades

    Chocolate people find common ground

    Like two bastards in one room

    In the trees birds sing and life rings through the air like chapel bells

    While street huslers sell bones

    We join the dead with feathered tomb stones

     

    Chantal-Marie Taylor

     

    Will I ever walk the streets with pride? 'possibly tomorrow'

    I hate to look back on every wall

    Every space, a confinement

    cutting a chase to get me home.

    I long for the day when

    Within every footstep

    A pavement eases and smiles with joy

    Not

    Reflecting the pain of a boy

    And the blood of a man

    Because, within every gunshot

    My son is born.

     

    4. Responses to Jamaican Bible Study Tape..

  • Interesting imagining Jesus speaking patois
  • It was interesting to hear the Bible read that way
  • Hearing the readings adds character to the story
  • Seriousness...it caused me to take Jesus' words seriously when I heard them.
  • On first hearing didn't know whether to take it seriously or as a joke
  • It highlights how important the medium of communication is
  •  

     

    5. Final Celebration Session

     

    Outline of session:

    Song: My Jesus my Saviour (all)

    Poem, 'Untitled' - Cory

    Poem, 'I See' - Matthew

    Dance

    Poem 'Untitled' - John

    Poem 'A Poem' - Andrew

    Song, 'Amazing Grace' - Naomi

    Drama

    Poem 'Reality' - Yemi

    Poem 'Possibly Tomorrow' - Chantal

    Prayer - Sam

    Song 'Lean on me' - all

     

     

    CONCLUSION BY THEOLOGICAL REFLECTOR

     

    Next Steps

     

    This partnership of the Youth and Children's Work Committee and local projects was always intended to provide a resource from which people in other local churches and situations could easily benefit and learn.

     

    There is great variety in the way in which the projects have sought to reach out to young people. Each one has been very conscious that its actions were based on putting into practice the implications of the Christian Gospel.

     

    Each one illustrates the need for careful preparation taking advantage of professional advice and the support, for instance, of Synod Youth and Children's Work Trainers.

     

    Each one shows the need for committed and able leadership, for effective teamwork and the ability to adapt to changing circumstances.

     

    All have been 'person centred' in that they have taken account of the needs, gifts, background and interests of the young people they sought to engage with. But they have also worked to their strengths, the abilities of their leaders and volunteers. They have also shown the need for and value of good management and financial planning. In the end, the financial contribution from the URC/DfES has not always been critical to their success but has acted as a lever to further funding and opened a way whereby the URC could be a partner.

     

    They are now offered as a resource for wider use and information. Your interest in knowing more about these projects will be welcomed, particularly if you are at the stage of exploring possibilities in your own locality. They represent good practice and a wealth of experience. Those involved will welcome your interest and be glad to share the experience and expertise which they have gained. Please contact the Youth Office at United Reformed Church House - 020 7916 8682.

     

    'Mission Possible' has not come to an end. The three years of funding support by the DfES has. However, the United Reformed Church does have limited financial resources available to support projects for 'Social action' and 'New enterprise in mission' and most Synods have funds designed to assist local churches in mission projects. But the most important resource is local initiative and commitment to the inclusion of young people in the life of their local communities and churches. The foregoing projects show how effectively this can be done.

     

     

    RESOURCE LIST

     

    United Reformed Church Documents

    Available from: Youth Office

    United Reformed Church

    86 Tavistock Place

    London WC1H 9RT

    Tel: 020 7916 8682

    Email: Youth Office

     

    Feasibility Study - Tim Barnes, Education Consultant

    Mission Possible Briefing paper - Youth & Children's Work Committee, DfES Monitoring Group

    Youth & Children's Work Training & Development Officers Contact List

    Critique

    Good Practice Second Edition - available through the URC Bookshop

    (020 7916 8629)

     

    DfES Website

     

    Connexions Website

     

    Churches Together in England (CTE)

    Executive Officer (Youth) - John Baxter-Brown

    Churches Together in England

    27 Tavistock Square

    London WC1H 9HH

    Tel: 020 7529 8133

     

    Good Practice in Ecumenical Youth Work - ISBN 1 874295 204

     

    Other Agencies

     

    National Council for Voluntary Youth Services (NCVYS)

    2 Plough Yard

    Shoreditch High Street

    London EC2A 3LP

    Tel: 020 7422 8630

    Email

    Website

     

    National Youth Agency (NYA)

    17-23 Albion Street

    Leicester LE1 6GD

    Tel: 0116 285 3700

    Website

     

    The Prince's Trust

    18 Park Square East

    London NW1 4LH

    Tel: 0800 842842

    Website

     

    The National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO)

    Regents Wharf

    8 All Saints Street

    London N1 9RL

    Tel: 020 7713 6161

    Helpdesk: 0800 2798 798

    Email

    Website

     

    Millennium Volunteers

    MV Unit

    Department for Education and Skills

    Room E4

    Moorfoot

    Sheffield S1 4PQ

    Email

    Website

     

    AMAZE

    P O Box 5898

    Hinckley

    LE10 2YX

    Tel: 0121 503 0824

    Email: amaze@clara.co.uk

    Website

     

    Time for God (TfG)

    Chester House

    Pages Lane

    London N10 1PR

    Tel: 020 8883 1504

    Email

    Website

     

    Literature

    The Web of Insights

    Anne Frank Educational Trust

    P O Box 11880

    London N6 4LN

    Tel: 020 8340 9077

    Email

    Website

     

    Youth Work Magazine

    Subscriptions:

    Tel: 01892 652364

    Website: www.youthwork.co.uk

    Young People Now

    Subscriptions:

    Tel: 020 8606 7500

    Email

    Website

     

    Shabaab

    National Youth Agency

    ISBN: 1466-819x

    NYA Publications Catalogue

    National Youth Agency

     

    Funding

    Grants & Loans Group

    Secretary: Miss Jean Thomson

    28 Mountcombe Close

    Surbiton

    Surrey KT6 6LJ

    Tel; 020 8390 5232

    Email

     

    Funder Finder

    Website: www.funderfinder.org.uk

    Directory of Social Change - Youth Funding Guide

    ISBN: 1 900360 96 9

    InKind Direct

    19 Milk Street

    London EC2V 8AN

    Tel: 020 7860 5930

    Fax: 020 7860 5920

    Website

     

    Other Contacts

    Local partnership organisations such as:

    Local Authority Youth Service

    Local Council for Voluntary Services

    Social Services

    Learning Skills Councils

    Local Trusts and Businesses

    Voluntary Sector Organisations

     

    Comprehensive local information should be available from libraries and Citizens Advice Bureau's.

     

     

    APPENDICES

     

    Appendix 1 Match Funding paper

     

    Appendix 2 Five Marks of Mission

     

    Appendix 3 DFES Project 2002-2005

    Briefing paper for Synods

     

     

    Appendix 1

     

    Mission Possible - The URC Social Inclusion Project

     

    Briefing Paper on Match Funding

     

    Increasingly funders are demanding that projects 'match fund' any monies they give. By this they mean 'we will give you 50%, (or 60% or whatever % it might be) of the total amount you need if you can raise the other 50% (or 40%) from other sources'. In the case of the DfEE funded URC Social Inclusion Project the match funding is 50%.

    The newer funding regimes like the Single Regeneration Budget (SRB), English Partnerships Community Investment Fund, the European Social Fund, and some of the National Lottery distributing bodies require you to find a percentage of what you're asking for from elsewhere.

     

    Other funders, like the local authority and charitable trusts, even if they don't demand that you find matching funding, may be more likely to fund you if you can show that others are committed to funding part of your project. So it might help you with your fundraising if you put together your own funding package where you ask a number of funders to each put in a matching amount of money to make up the full costs of the project. Or you might be able to raise part of the costs of your project from doing your own fundraising.

     

    What counts as match funding?

     

    Any of the following can be counted:

  • grants from other public or private sources such as a local authority, a charitable trust or company
  • raising the matching cash yourselves through running fundraising events like jumble sales and street collections
  • income generation through selling your services or goods
  • non-cash support or gifts in kind such as donations of equipment, use of buildings, volunteers' time, and the time of others given free like your management committee members. You need to put a cash value to these things so that you can show how much they are worth in terms of match funding.
  •  

    Do we have to match pound for pound?

     

    It depends entirely upon the funder's policies. The amount you need to find can vary from 10% upwards; around 50% is most common. Some funders, like European funds, will demand that you match their contribution pound for pound and may deduct a pound for every pound you fail to find elsewhere. Other funders are much more flexible in their approach. Don't make assumptions about what they mean. Check their guidelines carefully.

     

    You will also need to check what their rules say about what they will count as match funding -

  • some public funders will not allow other public funds as match funding. For example, you cannot match money from one European programme against another
  • some funders will not allow non-cash or gifts in kind to be counted
  • some funders will not make a decision about your grant until you can show you have the required match funding in place. The European Social Fund requires you to produce a signed 'public match funding certificate' proving you have found matched funding before they will approve your grant.
  •  

    Why funders like match funding

     

    Because it demonstrates the credibility of the scheme if another funder has already decided that it is 'worth' funding.

  • The credibility of your group is enhanced if you can say 'we can get this ourselves if you give us the rest'.
  • It stretches funders' pots of money further so that they can be seen to be supporting more projects.
  • It gives the funder a sense of value for money - they can be part of a project without having to foot the whole bill.
  • A project which already has some funding in place is less risky to support than one that has no funding.
  •  

    The cash value of 'gifts in kind' or volunteering

     

    It should be quite easy to find out the cash value of gifts in kind like equipment, furniture, use of buildings. Look through catalogues, check rent rates, heating and lighting bills and so on.

     

    Assessing the financial value of volunteers' time is slightly more complicated. It will take time to collect and pull together all the information you need to do an audit or valuation. You can do it by using the following procedure:

     

    Step 1 - work out your investment in volunteers:

  • Identify all your expenditure on volunteers, including the costs of advertising and recruitment, induction and training, supplies and equipment, travel expenses, accommodation and food, other expenses (phone calls etc), volunteer administration, support and rewards, management time, insurance, building costs and expenses such as rent, electricity, phone bills.
  • Collect together all the figures and amounts from estimates and your budget.
  • Add all the costs together and this will give you your total expenditure on volunteers.
  •  

    Step 2 - work out the value of volunteering:

  • Describe and classify the work that volunteers do (reception duties, home visits, administration, advice work etc).
  • Count the number of volunteers and how many hours are spent on different activities.
  • Identify what the equivalent pay rate would be for each activity (if you have job titles the job centre can provide the going wage rate).